Much research found that economic inequality—the dispersion of incomes distribution among individuals in a society—affects subjective well-being (SWB). As a meta-analysis has shown, the association between economic inequality, commonly measured by the Gini index, and individuals' SWB is weak and not significant. Psychosocial research suggests that the situational perception, rather than objective reality, has a greater impact on individuals. Our aim was to investigate whether and how objective and subjective measures of economic inequality affect the subjective individuals' well-being, both in its affective and cognitive components. A representative Italian sample (N = 1446, 51% women; average age = 42.42 years, SD = 12.87) answered an online survey. Multilevel regressions detected a negative and significant effect of the inequality perception on well-being. In contrast, the Gini index showed no effect. Two psychological mechanisms explain the association between perceived inequality and well-being: Perceived anger toward inequality and individuals' economic vulnerability. The parallel mediation models showed that the effect of perceived inequality is conveyed by cognitive (economic vulnerability) and emotional (anger) processing of inequality. Findings also highlighted the role of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Vezzoli, M., Valtorta, R., Mari, S., Durante, F., Volpato, C. (2023). Effects of objective and subjective indicators of economic inequality on subjective well-being: Underlying mechanisms. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 53(2 (February 2023)), 85-100 [10.1111/jasp.12928].

Effects of objective and subjective indicators of economic inequality on subjective well-being: Underlying mechanisms

Vezzoli, M
;
Valtorta, RR;Mari, S;Durante, F;Volpato, C
2023

Abstract

Much research found that economic inequality—the dispersion of incomes distribution among individuals in a society—affects subjective well-being (SWB). As a meta-analysis has shown, the association between economic inequality, commonly measured by the Gini index, and individuals' SWB is weak and not significant. Psychosocial research suggests that the situational perception, rather than objective reality, has a greater impact on individuals. Our aim was to investigate whether and how objective and subjective measures of economic inequality affect the subjective individuals' well-being, both in its affective and cognitive components. A representative Italian sample (N = 1446, 51% women; average age = 42.42 years, SD = 12.87) answered an online survey. Multilevel regressions detected a negative and significant effect of the inequality perception on well-being. In contrast, the Gini index showed no effect. Two psychological mechanisms explain the association between perceived inequality and well-being: Perceived anger toward inequality and individuals' economic vulnerability. The parallel mediation models showed that the effect of perceived inequality is conveyed by cognitive (economic vulnerability) and emotional (anger) processing of inequality. Findings also highlighted the role of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Perceived economic inequality; Objective economic inequality; Well - being
English
22-ott-2022
2023
53
2 (February 2023)
85
100
open
Vezzoli, M., Valtorta, R., Mari, S., Durante, F., Volpato, C. (2023). Effects of objective and subjective indicators of economic inequality on subjective well-being: Underlying mechanisms. JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 53(2 (February 2023)), 85-100 [10.1111/jasp.12928].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vezzoli-2022-JASP-AAM.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Original Article
Tipologia di allegato: Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 550.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
550.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/394891
Citazioni
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
Social impact