The authors replicated the study by D. Abrams, J. M. Marques, N. Bown, and M. Henson (2000, Study 2), performed to test the subjective group dynamics model (J. M. Marques, D. Abrams, D. Paez, & C. Martinez-Taboada, 1998). Participants were students enrolled in the psychology department at an Italian university. The present study considered the relationship between students and professors, and the attitude object was limited enrollment for admission to the department. Participants evaluated either in-group or out-group members. Findings replicated those of Abrams et al., except the in-group pronorm deviant was perceived to be less typical and evaluated less positively than the normative members. This finding suggests that, during an intergroup conflict, perception of the typicality of deviants exaggerating the in-group norms—and thus their evaluations—may increase as long as deviance is not perceived to be too accentuated.
Hichy, Z., Mari, S., & Capozza, D. (2008). Pronorm and antinorm deviants: Testing the subjective group dynamics model. THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 148(5), 641-644.
|Citazione:||Hichy, Z., Mari, S., & Capozza, D. (2008). Pronorm and antinorm deviants: Testing the subjective group dynamics model. THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 148(5), 641-644.|
|Tipo:||Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico|
|Carattere della pubblicazione:||Scientifica|
|Titolo:||Pronorm and antinorm deviants: Testing the subjective group dynamics model|
|Autori:||Hichy, Z; Mari, S; Capozza, D|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2008|
|Rivista:||THE JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI):||http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.5.641-644|
|Appare nelle tipologie:||01 - Articolo su rivista|