Research on later-life transitions spans multiple disciplines, yet perspectives often remain fragmented. This paper demonstrates how interdisciplinarity, guided by epistemic reflexivity, can produce a more integrated understanding of later-life transitions. Drawing on a meta-narrative review, four research traditions–education, sociology, gerontology, and management–are examined to reconstruct discipline-specific storylines and generate a cross-disciplinary synthesis. The process unfolds through iterative reflection on assumptions, concepts, and methods, highlighting how disciplinary positions shape knowledge. Six cross-disciplinary narratives emerge: vulnerability and loss, learning and growth, relational embeddedness, unequal trajectories, enacted practices, and systemic dynamics. Together, they portray later-life transitions as complex, relational, and systemic processes spanning micro, meso, and macro levels. Methodologically, the study illustrates how combining meta-narrative review with epistemic reflexivity enables the construction of integrated interdisciplinary knowledge. Conceptually, it reframes later-life transitions as multilevel, dynamic phenomena. More broadly, the study positions research on later-life transitions as a productive arena for developing interdisciplinary approaches in educational gerontology.

Formenti, L., Compagni, A., Mele, C., Nazio, T., Principi, A., Bufali, M., et al. (2026). Interdisciplinarity and epistemic reflexivity. A methodological approach to the study of later-life transitions. EDUCATIONAL GERONTOLOGY, 1-18 [10.1080/03601277.2026.2663353].

Interdisciplinarity and epistemic reflexivity. A methodological approach to the study of later-life transitions

Formenti, Laura;Cino, Davide;
2026

Abstract

Research on later-life transitions spans multiple disciplines, yet perspectives often remain fragmented. This paper demonstrates how interdisciplinarity, guided by epistemic reflexivity, can produce a more integrated understanding of later-life transitions. Drawing on a meta-narrative review, four research traditions–education, sociology, gerontology, and management–are examined to reconstruct discipline-specific storylines and generate a cross-disciplinary synthesis. The process unfolds through iterative reflection on assumptions, concepts, and methods, highlighting how disciplinary positions shape knowledge. Six cross-disciplinary narratives emerge: vulnerability and loss, learning and growth, relational embeddedness, unequal trajectories, enacted practices, and systemic dynamics. Together, they portray later-life transitions as complex, relational, and systemic processes spanning micro, meso, and macro levels. Methodologically, the study illustrates how combining meta-narrative review with epistemic reflexivity enables the construction of integrated interdisciplinary knowledge. Conceptually, it reframes later-life transitions as multilevel, dynamic phenomena. More broadly, the study positions research on later-life transitions as a productive arena for developing interdisciplinary approaches in educational gerontology.
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
ageing; interdisciplinarity; epistemic reflexivity; transitions; longevity; later-life
English
8-giu-2026
2026
1
18
reserved
Formenti, L., Compagni, A., Mele, C., Nazio, T., Principi, A., Bufali, M., et al. (2026). Interdisciplinarity and epistemic reflexivity. A methodological approach to the study of later-life transitions. EDUCATIONAL GERONTOLOGY, 1-18 [10.1080/03601277.2026.2663353].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Formenti et al-2026-Educational Gerontology-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 717.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
717.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/611982
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact