Biologization – a form of dehumanization in which others are considered as disease carriers rather than humans – is common in the political debate; however, its effects have been understudied. To fill this gap, we conducted three pre-registered experimental studies in which biological language was manipulated through vignettes. We found that using disease metaphors (vs. negative but non-dehumanizing language) to describe others increased biologization, indirect (vs. direct) aggression, and exclusionary intentions. Study 1 (N = 201) provided initial evidence of these associations. Study 2 (N = 204) and Study 3 (N = 248) deepened these results, indicating that the effect of biological language on indirect aggression via biologization (Study 2) and accessibility of aggressive thoughts (Study 3) was bigger and significant for participants with high and medium (vs. low) levels of disgust sensitivity. This research highlights how framing groups as biological threats can intensify aggression and exclusion, shedding light on this dehumanizing rhetoric.

Valtorta, R., Baldissarri, C., Volpato, C. (2026). Metaphors matter: The effect of biological dehumanizing language on indirect aggression. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 45(9) [10.1007/s12144-026-09290-4].

Metaphors matter: The effect of biological dehumanizing language on indirect aggression

Valtorta R. R.
;
Baldissarri C.;
2026

Abstract

Biologization – a form of dehumanization in which others are considered as disease carriers rather than humans – is common in the political debate; however, its effects have been understudied. To fill this gap, we conducted three pre-registered experimental studies in which biological language was manipulated through vignettes. We found that using disease metaphors (vs. negative but non-dehumanizing language) to describe others increased biologization, indirect (vs. direct) aggression, and exclusionary intentions. Study 1 (N = 201) provided initial evidence of these associations. Study 2 (N = 204) and Study 3 (N = 248) deepened these results, indicating that the effect of biological language on indirect aggression via biologization (Study 2) and accessibility of aggressive thoughts (Study 3) was bigger and significant for participants with high and medium (vs. low) levels of disgust sensitivity. This research highlights how framing groups as biological threats can intensify aggression and exclusion, shedding light on this dehumanizing rhetoric.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Aggression; Biologization; Dehumanization; Disgust; Exclusion; Metaphors;
English
30-apr-2026
2026
45
9
884
open
Valtorta, R., Baldissarri, C., Volpato, C. (2026). Metaphors matter: The effect of biological dehumanizing language on indirect aggression. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 45(9) [10.1007/s12144-026-09290-4].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Valtorta et al-2026-Curr Psychol-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 2.03 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.03 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/606754
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact