This paper examines collectible design as an emergent hybrid domain at the intersection of art, design, and luxury. Using a two-round Delphi method with expert participants (curators, collectors, designers, and market professionals), we elicited and synthesized judgments in a context marked by ambiguous boundaries and information asymmetries. The study identifies consensus on core value drivers (e.g., authorship, uniqueness, narrative, and aesthetic resonance) and on the central role of expert mediation and field-configuring events in conferring legitimacy. Building on these insights, we introduce symbolic infrastructure as a layered framework (linking evaluative devices, institutional platforms, and identity work) that explains how collectible design stabilizes as a field. The resulting conceptual model specifies directional relationships among category definitions, valuation practices, collector identity, and institutional mechanisms, offering testable propositions for quantitative and mixed-methods research. This paper advances valuation theory, the sociology of cultural markets, and cultural economics by clarifying how novel symbolic fields emerge, structure meaning, and gain legitimacy, while demonstrating the suitability of the Delphi method for theorizing under conditions of limited standardization.

Codignola, F., Benedan, L., Mariani, P. (2026). Framing collectible design: a Delphi study on an emerging cultural-economic field. QUALITY & QUANTITY [10.1007/s11135-026-02799-7].

Framing collectible design: a Delphi study on an emerging cultural-economic field

Codignola, F
Primo
;
Benedan, L
Secondo
;
Mariani, P
Ultimo
2026

Abstract

This paper examines collectible design as an emergent hybrid domain at the intersection of art, design, and luxury. Using a two-round Delphi method with expert participants (curators, collectors, designers, and market professionals), we elicited and synthesized judgments in a context marked by ambiguous boundaries and information asymmetries. The study identifies consensus on core value drivers (e.g., authorship, uniqueness, narrative, and aesthetic resonance) and on the central role of expert mediation and field-configuring events in conferring legitimacy. Building on these insights, we introduce symbolic infrastructure as a layered framework (linking evaluative devices, institutional platforms, and identity work) that explains how collectible design stabilizes as a field. The resulting conceptual model specifies directional relationships among category definitions, valuation practices, collector identity, and institutional mechanisms, offering testable propositions for quantitative and mixed-methods research. This paper advances valuation theory, the sociology of cultural markets, and cultural economics by clarifying how novel symbolic fields emerge, structure meaning, and gain legitimacy, while demonstrating the suitability of the Delphi method for theorizing under conditions of limited standardization.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Collectible design; Delphi; Cultural markets
English
30-apr-2026
2026
none
Codignola, F., Benedan, L., Mariani, P. (2026). Framing collectible design: a Delphi study on an emerging cultural-economic field. QUALITY & QUANTITY [10.1007/s11135-026-02799-7].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/603481
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact