Dehumanisation is the perception of someone less than human. Several studies have used innovative approaches to investigate the subtle ways in which humanity can be denied. While most of these models clearly distinguish humans from animals and robots, none adequately capture the huge range of dehumanisation that exists in metaphorical thought, such as disease-related metaphors (i.e., biologisation). Building on existing theoretical frameworks concerning dehumanisation, we developed a set of items (i.e., the Tripartite Agency Attribution Scale) measuring the capacity to experience emotions (affective mental states), produce effective actions (behavioural potential), and think rationally (cognitive abilities), and demonstrated the relevance of this approach to assess biological dehumanisation. Study 1 (N = 512) and Study 2 (N = 237) consistently showed that viruses (vs. animals vs. humans) are perceived as possessing behavioural potential but lacking affective mental states and higher-order cognitions. Accordingly, Study 3 (N = 250) showed that biologised (vs. animalised vs. mechanised vs. non-dehumanised) social groups in Italian society are perceived as primarily possessing behavioural potential with limited affective and cognitive abilities. Our research provides empirical evidence of a new, subtle way to investigate one of the most understudied forms of dehumanisation, while also expanding the literature on this process. Please refer to the Supporting Information section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

Valtorta, R., Baldissarri, C., Palena, N., Volpato, C. (2025). Agency Attribution and Biological Dehumanisation: Preliminary Evidence. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 35(5) [10.1002/casp.70146].

Agency Attribution and Biological Dehumanisation: Preliminary Evidence

Valtorta R. R.;Baldissarri C.;Volpato C.
2025

Abstract

Dehumanisation is the perception of someone less than human. Several studies have used innovative approaches to investigate the subtle ways in which humanity can be denied. While most of these models clearly distinguish humans from animals and robots, none adequately capture the huge range of dehumanisation that exists in metaphorical thought, such as disease-related metaphors (i.e., biologisation). Building on existing theoretical frameworks concerning dehumanisation, we developed a set of items (i.e., the Tripartite Agency Attribution Scale) measuring the capacity to experience emotions (affective mental states), produce effective actions (behavioural potential), and think rationally (cognitive abilities), and demonstrated the relevance of this approach to assess biological dehumanisation. Study 1 (N = 512) and Study 2 (N = 237) consistently showed that viruses (vs. animals vs. humans) are perceived as possessing behavioural potential but lacking affective mental states and higher-order cognitions. Accordingly, Study 3 (N = 250) showed that biologised (vs. animalised vs. mechanised vs. non-dehumanised) social groups in Italian society are perceived as primarily possessing behavioural potential with limited affective and cognitive abilities. Our research provides empirical evidence of a new, subtle way to investigate one of the most understudied forms of dehumanisation, while also expanding the literature on this process. Please refer to the Supporting Information section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
agency attribution; animalisation; biologisation; dehumanisation; disease metaphors;
English
4-ago-2025
2025
35
5
e70146
open
Valtorta, R., Baldissarri, C., Palena, N., Volpato, C. (2025). Agency Attribution and Biological Dehumanisation: Preliminary Evidence. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 35(5) [10.1002/casp.70146].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Valtorta et al-2025-Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 529.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
529.24 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/578681
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
Social impact