Four studies tested the proposition that regulation of collective guilt in the face of harmful ingroup behavior involves motivated reasoning. Cognitive energetics theory suggests that motivated reasoning is a function of goal importance, mental resource availability, and task demands. Accordingly, three studies conducted in the United States and Israel demonstrated that high importance of avoiding collective guilt, represented by group identification (Studies 1 and 3) and conservative ideological orientation (Study 2), is negatively related to collective guilt, but only when mental resources are not depleted by cognitive load. The fourth study, conducted in Italy, demonstrated that when justifications for the ingroup’s harmful behavior are immediately available, the task of regulating collective guilt and shame becomes less demanding and less susceptible to resource depletion. By combining knowledge from the domains of motivated cognition, emotion regulation, and intergroup relations, these cross-cultural studies offer novel insights regarding factors underlying the regulation of collective guilt.

Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M., Colucci, F. (2015). To Feel or Not to Feel When My Group Harms Others? The Regulation of Collective Guilt as Motivated Reasoning. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETTIN, 41(9), 1223-1235 [10.1177/0146167215592843].

To Feel or Not to Feel When My Group Harms Others? The Regulation of Collective Guilt as Motivated Reasoning

BRAMBILLA, MARCO
Secondo
;
COLUCCI, FRANCESCO PAOLO
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

Four studies tested the proposition that regulation of collective guilt in the face of harmful ingroup behavior involves motivated reasoning. Cognitive energetics theory suggests that motivated reasoning is a function of goal importance, mental resource availability, and task demands. Accordingly, three studies conducted in the United States and Israel demonstrated that high importance of avoiding collective guilt, represented by group identification (Studies 1 and 3) and conservative ideological orientation (Study 2), is negatively related to collective guilt, but only when mental resources are not depleted by cognitive load. The fourth study, conducted in Italy, demonstrated that when justifications for the ingroup’s harmful behavior are immediately available, the task of regulating collective guilt and shame becomes less demanding and less susceptible to resource depletion. By combining knowledge from the domains of motivated cognition, emotion regulation, and intergroup relations, these cross-cultural studies offer novel insights regarding factors underlying the regulation of collective guilt.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
collective guilt; emotion regulation; moral disengagement; motivated reasoning;
collective guilt, emotion regulation, motivated reasoning, moral disengagement
English
2015
41
9
1223
1235
reserved
Sharvit, K., Brambilla, M., Babush, M., Colucci, F. (2015). To Feel or Not to Feel When My Group Harms Others? The Regulation of Collective Guilt as Motivated Reasoning. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETTIN, 41(9), 1223-1235 [10.1177/0146167215592843].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sharvit et al (2015) - PSPB.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 639.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
639.34 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/88164
Citazioni
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
Social impact