Interest in crossmodal correspondences has recently seen a renaissance thanks to numerous studies in human adults. Yet, still very little is known about crossmodal correspondences in children, particularly in sensory pairings other than audition and vision. In the current study, we investigated whether 4-5-year-old children match auditory pitch to the spatial motion of visual objects (audio-visual condition). In addition, we investigated whether this correspondence extends to touch, i.e., whether children also match auditory pitch to the spatial motion of touch (audio-tactile condition) and the spatial motion of visual objects to touch (visuo-tactile condition). In two experiments, two different groups of children were asked to indicate which of two stimuli fitted best with a centrally located third stimulus (Experiment 1), or to report whether two presented stimuli fitted together well (Experiment 2). We found sensitivity to the congruency of all of the sensory pairings only in Experiment 2, suggesting that only under specific circumstances can these correspondences be observed. Our results suggest that pitch-height correspondences for audio-visual and audio-tactile combinations may still be weak in preschool children, and speculate that this could be due to immature linguistic and auditory cues that are still developing at age five.

Nava, E., Grassi, M., Turati, C. (2016). Audio-visual, visuo-tactile and audio-tactile correspondences in preschoolers. MULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 29(1-3), 93-111 [10.1163/22134808-00002493].

Audio-visual, visuo-tactile and audio-tactile correspondences in preschoolers

NAVA, ELENA HAE KYUNG
Primo
;
TURATI, CHIARA
Ultimo
2016

Abstract

Interest in crossmodal correspondences has recently seen a renaissance thanks to numerous studies in human adults. Yet, still very little is known about crossmodal correspondences in children, particularly in sensory pairings other than audition and vision. In the current study, we investigated whether 4-5-year-old children match auditory pitch to the spatial motion of visual objects (audio-visual condition). In addition, we investigated whether this correspondence extends to touch, i.e., whether children also match auditory pitch to the spatial motion of touch (audio-tactile condition) and the spatial motion of visual objects to touch (visuo-tactile condition). In two experiments, two different groups of children were asked to indicate which of two stimuli fitted best with a centrally located third stimulus (Experiment 1), or to report whether two presented stimuli fitted together well (Experiment 2). We found sensitivity to the congruency of all of the sensory pairings only in Experiment 2, suggesting that only under specific circumstances can these correspondences be observed. Our results suggest that pitch-height correspondences for audio-visual and audio-tactile combinations may still be weak in preschool children, and speculate that this could be due to immature linguistic and auditory cues that are still developing at age five.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Audition; Crossmodal correspondences; Development; Learning; Preschool children; Touch; Vision;
development, crossmodal correspondences, preschoolers
English
1-gen-2016
2016
29
1-3
93
111
reserved
Nava, E., Grassi, M., Turati, C. (2016). Audio-visual, visuo-tactile and audio-tactile correspondences in preschoolers. MULTISENSORY RESEARCH, 29(1-3), 93-111 [10.1163/22134808-00002493].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
[22134808 - Multisensory Research] Audio-Visual, Visuo-Tactile and Audio-Tactile Correspondences in Preschoolers (1).pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.37 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.37 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/84054
Citazioni
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 29
Social impact