Background: Cut-point finding is a crucial step for clinical decision making when dealing with diagnostic (or prognostic) biomarkers. The extension of ROC-based cut-point finding methods to the case of censored failure time outcome is of interest when we are in the presence of a biomarker, measured at baseline, used to identify whether there will be the development, or not, of some disease condition within a given time point τ of clinical interest. Methods: Three widely used cut-point finding methods, namely the Youden index, the concordance probability and the point closest to-(0,1) corner in the ROC plane, are extended to the case of censored failure time outcome resorting to non-parametric estimators of the sensitivity and specificity that account for censoring. The performance of these methods in finding the optimal cut-point is compared under Normal and Gamma distributions of the biomarker (in subjects developing or not the disease condition). Normality ensures that estimators point theoretically to the same cut-point. Two motivating examples are provided in the paper. Results: The point closest-to-(0,1) corner approach has the best performance from simulations in terms of mean square error and relative bias. Conclusions: We discuss the use of the Youden index or concordance probability associated to the cut-point identified through the closest-to-(0,1) corner approach to ease interpretability of the classification performance of the dichotomized biomarker. In addition, the achieved performance of the dichotomized biomarker classification associated to the estimated cut-point can be represented through a confidence interval of the point on the ROC curve.

Rota, M., Antolini, L., Valsecchi, M. (2015). Optimal cut-point definition in biomarkers: The case of censored failure time outcome. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 15(1) [10.1186/s12874-015-0009-y].

Optimal cut-point definition in biomarkers: The case of censored failure time outcome

ROTA, MATTEO
Primo
;
ANTOLINI, LAURA
Secondo
;
VALSECCHI, MARIA GRAZIA
Ultimo
2015

Abstract

Background: Cut-point finding is a crucial step for clinical decision making when dealing with diagnostic (or prognostic) biomarkers. The extension of ROC-based cut-point finding methods to the case of censored failure time outcome is of interest when we are in the presence of a biomarker, measured at baseline, used to identify whether there will be the development, or not, of some disease condition within a given time point τ of clinical interest. Methods: Three widely used cut-point finding methods, namely the Youden index, the concordance probability and the point closest to-(0,1) corner in the ROC plane, are extended to the case of censored failure time outcome resorting to non-parametric estimators of the sensitivity and specificity that account for censoring. The performance of these methods in finding the optimal cut-point is compared under Normal and Gamma distributions of the biomarker (in subjects developing or not the disease condition). Normality ensures that estimators point theoretically to the same cut-point. Two motivating examples are provided in the paper. Results: The point closest-to-(0,1) corner approach has the best performance from simulations in terms of mean square error and relative bias. Conclusions: We discuss the use of the Youden index or concordance probability associated to the cut-point identified through the closest-to-(0,1) corner approach to ease interpretability of the classification performance of the dichotomized biomarker. In addition, the achieved performance of the dichotomized biomarker classification associated to the estimated cut-point can be represented through a confidence interval of the point on the ROC curve.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Optimal cut-point; Censored failure time outcome; Youden index; Concordance probability; Point closest-to-(0,1) corner in the ROC plane
English
2015
15
1
24
open
Rota, M., Antolini, L., Valsecchi, M. (2015). Optimal cut-point definition in biomarkers: The case of censored failure time outcome. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 15(1) [10.1186/s12874-015-0009-y].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-81542.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 761.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
761.01 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/81542
Citazioni
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
Social impact