This article aims to provide an analysis of the case concerning the delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (Nicaragua v. Colombia), decided by the International Court of Justice in 2023, focusing on the conclusions regarding customary international law related to the delimitation of this portion of the maritime territory of the States. To achieve this objective, the relationship between the legal regimes of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf in customary international law, the interaction of the International Court of Justice with the jurisprudence of other international courts in identifying the applicable rules, as well as the methodology employed to identify custom and its constitutive elements in the case, are examined. The study concludes that, in this case, the Court does not depart from its previous jurisprudence, reiterating some previously identified trends, but seems to undermine the persuasiveness of the legal reasoning developed to identify customary law concerning the delimitation of the extended continental shelf.
Fonseca Melo, R., Lima, L. (2024). O caso Nicarágua v. Colômbia II e a identificação do costume internacional relativo à delimitação da plataforma continental para além das 200 milhas náuticas. INTER (RIO DE JANEIRO), 7(2), 1-26.
O caso Nicarágua v. Colômbia II e a identificação do costume internacional relativo à delimitação da plataforma continental para além das 200 milhas náuticas
Fonseca Melo, RPrimo
;
2024
Abstract
This article aims to provide an analysis of the case concerning the delimitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (Nicaragua v. Colombia), decided by the International Court of Justice in 2023, focusing on the conclusions regarding customary international law related to the delimitation of this portion of the maritime territory of the States. To achieve this objective, the relationship between the legal regimes of the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf in customary international law, the interaction of the International Court of Justice with the jurisprudence of other international courts in identifying the applicable rules, as well as the methodology employed to identify custom and its constitutive elements in the case, are examined. The study concludes that, in this case, the Court does not depart from its previous jurisprudence, reiterating some previously identified trends, but seems to undermine the persuasiveness of the legal reasoning developed to identify customary law concerning the delimitation of the extended continental shelf.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fonseca Melo-2024-Inter-VoR.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
354.66 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
354.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


