What are the quality factors that define a "good" usability evaluation method and contribute to its acceptability and adoption in a real business context? How can we measure such factors? This paper investigates these issues and proposes to decompose the broad, general concept of "methodological quality" into more measurable, lower level attributes such as performance, efficiency, cost effectiveness, and learnability. We exemplify how to measure such attributes, reporting an empirical evaluation study of a usability inspection method for web applications called MiLE+.
Bolchini, D., Garzotto, F. (2007). Quality of Web Usability Evaluation Methods: An Empirical Study on MiLE+. In Web Information Systems Engineering – WISE 2007 Workshops WISE 2007 International Workshops Nancy, France, December 3, 2007 Proceedings (pp.481-492). Springer Berlin Heidelberg [10.1007/978-3-540-77010-7_47].
Quality of Web Usability Evaluation Methods: An Empirical Study on MiLE+
Garzotto, F
2007
Abstract
What are the quality factors that define a "good" usability evaluation method and contribute to its acceptability and adoption in a real business context? How can we measure such factors? This paper investigates these issues and proposes to decompose the broad, general concept of "methodological quality" into more measurable, lower level attributes such as performance, efficiency, cost effectiveness, and learnability. We exemplify how to measure such attributes, reporting an empirical evaluation study of a usability inspection method for web applications called MiLE+.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bolchini-Garzotto-2007-WISE-VoR.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
471.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
471.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
