Objective: To investigate concordance between physicians and parents in rating the degree of functional ability of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods: The attending physician and a parent were asked to rate independently the level of physical functioning of 155 patients with disease duration ≥ 5 years on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 = no disability (i.e. the child can do without difficulty all activities that children of his/her age can do) to 6 = severe disability (i.e. all activities are difficult for the child). At study visit, measures of JIA activity and damage were assessed. Agreement was evaluated with weighted kappa (<0.40 = poor agreement; 0.41-0.60 = moderate agreement; 0.61 - 0.80 = substantial agreement; > 0.80 excellent agreement). Physician/ parent evaluations were divided in 3 groups: 1) concordance; 2) parent over-rating = parent assessment over-rated relative to physician assessment; 3) physician over-rating = physician assessment over-rated r...
Palmisani, E., Solari, N., Pistorio, A., Ruperto, N., Malattia, C., Viola, S., et al. (2007). Agreement between physicians and parents in rating functional ability of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. PEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY ONLINE JOURNAL, 5, 23-23 [10.1186/1546-0096-5-23].
Agreement between physicians and parents in rating functional ability of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Ruperto N;
2007
Abstract
Objective: To investigate concordance between physicians and parents in rating the degree of functional ability of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Methods: The attending physician and a parent were asked to rate independently the level of physical functioning of 155 patients with disease duration ≥ 5 years on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 = no disability (i.e. the child can do without difficulty all activities that children of his/her age can do) to 6 = severe disability (i.e. all activities are difficult for the child). At study visit, measures of JIA activity and damage were assessed. Agreement was evaluated with weighted kappa (<0.40 = poor agreement; 0.41-0.60 = moderate agreement; 0.61 - 0.80 = substantial agreement; > 0.80 excellent agreement). Physician/ parent evaluations were divided in 3 groups: 1) concordance; 2) parent over-rating = parent assessment over-rated relative to physician assessment; 3) physician over-rating = physician assessment over-rated r...| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2007_PR_Palmisani.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
245.11 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
245.11 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


