OBJECTIVES: To compare respiratory system compliance (Crs) calculation during controlled mechanical ventilation (MV) and, subsequently, during assisted MV. DESIGN: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study. SETTING: This study was conducted on patients admitted to Neuro-ICU of Niguarda Hospital (tertiary referral hospital). PATIENTS: We analyzed every patient greater than or equal to 18 years old having a Crsmeasurement in controlled and in assisted MV within 60 minutes. Plateau pressure (Pplat) was considered reliable if it was deemed visually stable for at least 2 seconds. Interventions: Inspiratory pause was incorporated to detect Pplatin controlled and assisted MV. Calculation of Crsand driving pressure were achieved. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were studied. An acceptable agreement was found (Bland-Altman plot bias-3.9, level of agreement upper 21.6, lower-29.6). Crsin assisted MV was 64.1 (52.6-79.3) and in controlled MV it was 61.2 (50-71.2) mL/cm H2o (p = 0.006). No statistical difference was found in Crs(assisted vs controlled MV) when peak pressure was lower than Pplatnor when peak pressure was higher than Pplat. CONCLUSIONS: A Pplatvisually stable for at least 2 seconds leads to reliable Crscalculation during assisted MV.

Bastia, L., Amendolagine, L., Pozzi, F., Carenini, S., Cipolla, C., Curto, F., et al. (2023). Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation during Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 51(10), 201-205 [10.1097/CCM.0000000000005964].

Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation during Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study

Amendolagine L.;Bellani G.;Fumagalli R.;
2023

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare respiratory system compliance (Crs) calculation during controlled mechanical ventilation (MV) and, subsequently, during assisted MV. DESIGN: This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study. SETTING: This study was conducted on patients admitted to Neuro-ICU of Niguarda Hospital (tertiary referral hospital). PATIENTS: We analyzed every patient greater than or equal to 18 years old having a Crsmeasurement in controlled and in assisted MV within 60 minutes. Plateau pressure (Pplat) was considered reliable if it was deemed visually stable for at least 2 seconds. Interventions: Inspiratory pause was incorporated to detect Pplatin controlled and assisted MV. Calculation of Crsand driving pressure were achieved. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were studied. An acceptable agreement was found (Bland-Altman plot bias-3.9, level of agreement upper 21.6, lower-29.6). Crsin assisted MV was 64.1 (52.6-79.3) and in controlled MV it was 61.2 (50-71.2) mL/cm H2o (p = 0.006). No statistical difference was found in Crs(assisted vs controlled MV) when peak pressure was lower than Pplatnor when peak pressure was higher than Pplat. CONCLUSIONS: A Pplatvisually stable for at least 2 seconds leads to reliable Crscalculation during assisted MV.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Respiration, Artificial; Respiratory System; Retrospective Studies; Tidal Volume
English
2023
51
10
201
205
none
Bastia, L., Amendolagine, L., Pozzi, F., Carenini, S., Cipolla, C., Curto, F., et al. (2023). Reliability of Respiratory System Compliance Calculation during Assisted Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Study. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 51(10), 201-205 [10.1097/CCM.0000000000005964].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/477261
Citazioni
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
Social impact