Although still fragmented, the advancements within the empirical literature about the board-distress relationship have suggested that particular board features can have a role in enhancing the survival chances of distressed firms. This article aims at providing both the strategic management scholars and practitioners with the systematization of these advancements. The findings from the presented codification show that board independence tends to prevent crisis situations and to increase the survival chances of restructuring firms. Reinforcing board capabilities’ heterogeneity might also help in preventing/resolving crises. Board turnover may have a positive effect, too, as suggested by the negative effect of board tenure. Also, it is evidenced that the heterogeneity of the statistical methods employed by the extant literature has increased proportionally to time and journal ranking.

Abatecola, G., Farina, V., Gordini, N. (2011). Empirical Research on Corporate Distress: Assessing the Role of the Boards of Directors. Intervento presentato a: XX Tor Vergata Conference on Money, Banking and Finance: Actors, Rules and Policies after the Global Financial Crisis, Roma.

Empirical Research on Corporate Distress: Assessing the Role of the Boards of Directors

GORDINI, NICCOLO'
2011

Abstract

Although still fragmented, the advancements within the empirical literature about the board-distress relationship have suggested that particular board features can have a role in enhancing the survival chances of distressed firms. This article aims at providing both the strategic management scholars and practitioners with the systematization of these advancements. The findings from the presented codification show that board independence tends to prevent crisis situations and to increase the survival chances of restructuring firms. Reinforcing board capabilities’ heterogeneity might also help in preventing/resolving crises. Board turnover may have a positive effect, too, as suggested by the negative effect of board tenure. Also, it is evidenced that the heterogeneity of the statistical methods employed by the extant literature has increased proportionally to time and journal ranking.
paper
board of directors, corporate distress, empirical literature, systematic review, top management team
English
XX Tor Vergata Conference on Money, Banking and Finance: Actors, Rules and Policies after the Global Financial Crisis
2011
5-ott-2011
open
Abatecola, G., Farina, V., Gordini, N. (2011). Empirical Research on Corporate Distress: Assessing the Role of the Boards of Directors. Intervento presentato a: XX Tor Vergata Conference on Money, Banking and Finance: Actors, Rules and Policies after the Global Financial Crisis, Roma.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Empirical_Research_on_Corporate_Distress.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Other attachments
Dimensione 379.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
379.75 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/28364
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact