Objective: As precision medicine is becoming a standard of care in selecting tailored rather than average treatments, physiological measurements might represent the first step in applying personalized therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). A systematic assessment of respiratory mechanics in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could represent a step in this direction, for two main reasons. Approach and Main results: On the one hand, respiratory mechanics are a powerful physiological method to understand the severity of this syndrome in each single patient. Decreased respiratory system compliance, for example, is associated with low end expiratory lung volume and more severe lung injury. On the other hand, respiratory mechanics might guide protective mechanical ventilation settings. Improved gravitationally dependent regional lung compliance could support the selection of positive end-expiratory pressure and maximize alveolar recruitment. Moreover, the association between driving airway pressure and mortality in ARDS patients potentially underlines the importance of sizing tidal volume on respiratory system compliance rather than on predicted body weight. Significance: The present review article aims to describe the main alterations of respiratory mechanics in ARDS as a potent bedside tool to understand severity and guide mechanical ventilation settings, thus representing a readily available clinical resource for ICU physicians.

Mauri, T., Lazzeri, M., Bellani, G., Zanella, A., Grasselli, G. (2017). Respiratory mechanics to understand ARDS and guide mechanical ventilation. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 38(12), R280-R303 [10.1088/1361-6579/aa9052].

Respiratory mechanics to understand ARDS and guide mechanical ventilation

Mauri T.
;
Bellani G.;Zanella A.;Grasselli G.
2017

Abstract

Objective: As precision medicine is becoming a standard of care in selecting tailored rather than average treatments, physiological measurements might represent the first step in applying personalized therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU). A systematic assessment of respiratory mechanics in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could represent a step in this direction, for two main reasons. Approach and Main results: On the one hand, respiratory mechanics are a powerful physiological method to understand the severity of this syndrome in each single patient. Decreased respiratory system compliance, for example, is associated with low end expiratory lung volume and more severe lung injury. On the other hand, respiratory mechanics might guide protective mechanical ventilation settings. Improved gravitationally dependent regional lung compliance could support the selection of positive end-expiratory pressure and maximize alveolar recruitment. Moreover, the association between driving airway pressure and mortality in ARDS patients potentially underlines the importance of sizing tidal volume on respiratory system compliance rather than on predicted body weight. Significance: The present review article aims to describe the main alterations of respiratory mechanics in ARDS as a potent bedside tool to understand severity and guide mechanical ventilation settings, thus representing a readily available clinical resource for ICU physicians.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
acute respiratory distress syndrome, compliance, resistance, positive end-expiratory pressure, respiratory physiology, transpulmonary pressure
English
2017
38
12
R280
R303
none
Mauri, T., Lazzeri, M., Bellani, G., Zanella, A., Grasselli, G. (2017). Respiratory mechanics to understand ARDS and guide mechanical ventilation. PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 38(12), R280-R303 [10.1088/1361-6579/aa9052].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/281280
Citazioni
  • Scopus 27
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
Social impact