High-dose metoclopramide has been proposed as an effective antiemetic agent in patients treated with cisplatin. Its optimal dosage schedule, however, has not yet been completely defined. We report the results of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial where the efficacy and safety of two fixed high-dose regimens of metoclopramide (60 and 120 mg, respectively) have been tested in 112 patients receiving cisplatin treatment. No statistically significant difference has been found between the two groups. In patients treated with cisplatin at doses greater than 100 mg/m2, the higher dose regimen seems more efficacious, but this result should be confirmed in a larger group of patients. Treatment was generally well-tolerated. However, a consistent percentage of patients (about 60%) still present with vomiting, and this makes further investigation necessary.
Roila, F., Tonato, M., Basurto, C., Canaletti, R., Morsia, D., Passalacqua, R., et al. (1985). Antiemetic activity of two different high doses of metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: A randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research. CANCER TREATMENT REPORTS, 69(12), 1353-1357.
Antiemetic activity of two different high doses of metoclopramide in cisplatin-treated cancer patients: A randomized double-blind trial of the Italian Oncology Group for Clinical Research
COLOMBO, NICOLETTA;
1985
Abstract
High-dose metoclopramide has been proposed as an effective antiemetic agent in patients treated with cisplatin. Its optimal dosage schedule, however, has not yet been completely defined. We report the results of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial where the efficacy and safety of two fixed high-dose regimens of metoclopramide (60 and 120 mg, respectively) have been tested in 112 patients receiving cisplatin treatment. No statistically significant difference has been found between the two groups. In patients treated with cisplatin at doses greater than 100 mg/m2, the higher dose regimen seems more efficacious, but this result should be confirmed in a larger group of patients. Treatment was generally well-tolerated. However, a consistent percentage of patients (about 60%) still present with vomiting, and this makes further investigation necessary.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.