Research suggests that ostracism could promote endorsement of partisan falsehoods. Socially excluded individuals are uniquely attentive to distinctions between in-groups and out-groups, and act in ways intended to promote group belonging, potentially including a greater willingness to accept claims made by other group members. We test this assertion with a 2 (ostracism) X 2 (anonymity) X 2 (topic) mixed factorial design using the Ostracism Online paradigm with a demographically diverse online sample of Americans (N = 413). Results suggest that when ostracized, both Democrats and Republicans are more likely to endorse party-line falsehoods about the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. These effects are contingent on several individual-level differences, including strength of ideological commitment, cognitive reflection, and faith in intuition for facts. These patterns failed to replicate with fracking, a politically charged science topic.

Garrett, R., Sude, D., Riva, P. (2020). Toeing the Party Lie: Ostracism Promotes Endorsement of Partisan Election Falsehoods. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 37(2), 157-172 [10.1080/10584609.2019.1666943].

Toeing the Party Lie: Ostracism Promotes Endorsement of Partisan Election Falsehoods

Riva P.
Ultimo
2020

Abstract

Research suggests that ostracism could promote endorsement of partisan falsehoods. Socially excluded individuals are uniquely attentive to distinctions between in-groups and out-groups, and act in ways intended to promote group belonging, potentially including a greater willingness to accept claims made by other group members. We test this assertion with a 2 (ostracism) X 2 (anonymity) X 2 (topic) mixed factorial design using the Ostracism Online paradigm with a demographically diverse online sample of Americans (N = 413). Results suggest that when ostracized, both Democrats and Republicans are more likely to endorse party-line falsehoods about the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. These effects are contingent on several individual-level differences, including strength of ideological commitment, cognitive reflection, and faith in intuition for facts. These patterns failed to replicate with fracking, a politically charged science topic.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
misperception; motivated reasoning; politics; social exclusion; social influence
English
11-ott-2019
2020
37
2
157
172
none
Garrett, R., Sude, D., Riva, P. (2020). Toeing the Party Lie: Ostracism Promotes Endorsement of Partisan Election Falsehoods. POLITICAL COMMUNICATION, 37(2), 157-172 [10.1080/10584609.2019.1666943].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/267748
Citazioni
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
Social impact