The objectives of this research are to present two different educational interventions in CR and to assess their effectiveness in improving the psychological state of patients. In Cardiovascular Institute of Camogli 153 patients were enrolled: 113 participated in a closed structured group intervention (control group) consisting of three meetings with a fixed number of patients in which the fundamental themes of CR were treated. The other 40 patients participated in the open semi-structured group (experimental group) develop to better meet the needs of patients in CR: providing a minimum of three meetings for each patient. All patients were evaluated at entrance and discharge with a set of questionnaires related to different psychological characteristics. The results show that the two interventions lead to positive outcomes, which are substantially overlappable in the short term. If these findings were confirmed on a larger group, this could give important organizational alternatives to the operator, without reducing the effectiveness of intervention.

Baiardo, G., Savioli, G., Conti, M., Corsiglia, L., Miglioretti, M. (2011). Gruppo chiuso o gruppo aperto semistrutturato? Confronto tra due modalità di gestione del gruppo educativo in cardiologia riabilitativa. PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE, 2(2), 9-27 [10.3280/PDS2011-002002].

Gruppo chiuso o gruppo aperto semistrutturato? Confronto tra due modalità di gestione del gruppo educativo in cardiologia riabilitativa

MIGLIORETTI, MASSIMO
2011

Abstract

The objectives of this research are to present two different educational interventions in CR and to assess their effectiveness in improving the psychological state of patients. In Cardiovascular Institute of Camogli 153 patients were enrolled: 113 participated in a closed structured group intervention (control group) consisting of three meetings with a fixed number of patients in which the fundamental themes of CR were treated. The other 40 patients participated in the open semi-structured group (experimental group) develop to better meet the needs of patients in CR: providing a minimum of three meetings for each patient. All patients were evaluated at entrance and discharge with a set of questionnaires related to different psychological characteristics. The results show that the two interventions lead to positive outcomes, which are substantially overlappable in the short term. If these findings were confirmed on a larger group, this could give important organizational alternatives to the operator, without reducing the effectiveness of intervention.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
gruppo chiuso; gruppo aperto; self-efficacy; rappresentazione di malattia
Italian
2011
2
2
9
27
none
Baiardo, G., Savioli, G., Conti, M., Corsiglia, L., Miglioretti, M. (2011). Gruppo chiuso o gruppo aperto semistrutturato? Confronto tra due modalità di gestione del gruppo educativo in cardiologia riabilitativa. PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE, 2(2), 9-27 [10.3280/PDS2011-002002].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/25268
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact