The issue of the regulation of navigation through Turkish straits proved to be one of the most sensitive and thorny question of international law of the sea in the last years. Transit through theses waters is regulated by a 1936 Convention-"a long-standing" convention according to the article 35, lett. c, of UNCLOS-that is more concerned with the passage regime of warships rather than the transit of commercial vessels. In the last decades, the Montreux Convention has showed its inadequacy in regulating this latter kind navigation: the free-passage principle, by day and night without obstacles, could be considered well grounded time ago, when essentially vessels carrying cereal went through these waters. But nowadays it seems hazardous, for marine environment and security of populations, allowing free and unimpeded transit of fifteen tankers a day. It follows that the problem is how can Turkey, the only coastal State of the Straits (and international community) prevent in the future accidents or collisions between ships carrying oil, chemical or radioactive substances, endangering seriously the regional ecosystem? © 2005 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
SUMMARY: Introduction; The 1936 Montreux Convention and the Passage of Merchant Vessels ; Geographical Characteristics and Maritime Traffic in the Straits; The Turksih Measures: The 1998 Maritime Traffic Regulations for the Turkish Straits and the Marmara Region; The Turkish Straits Vessel Traffic Service; The IMO Rules and Recommendations on Navigation through the Strait of Istanbul, the Strait of Çannakale and the Marmara Sea; Concluding Remarks: Looking for a Legal Ground of Turkish Regulations.
Fornari, M. (2005). Conflicting Interests in the Turkish Straits: Is Free Passage of Merchant Vessels still Applicable?. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW, 20(2), 225-246 [10.1163/157180805775094445].
Conflicting Interests in the Turkish Straits: Is Free Passage of Merchant Vessels still Applicable?
FORNARI, MATTEO NICOLA
2005
Abstract
The issue of the regulation of navigation through Turkish straits proved to be one of the most sensitive and thorny question of international law of the sea in the last years. Transit through theses waters is regulated by a 1936 Convention-"a long-standing" convention according to the article 35, lett. c, of UNCLOS-that is more concerned with the passage regime of warships rather than the transit of commercial vessels. In the last decades, the Montreux Convention has showed its inadequacy in regulating this latter kind navigation: the free-passage principle, by day and night without obstacles, could be considered well grounded time ago, when essentially vessels carrying cereal went through these waters. But nowadays it seems hazardous, for marine environment and security of populations, allowing free and unimpeded transit of fifteen tankers a day. It follows that the problem is how can Turkey, the only coastal State of the Straits (and international community) prevent in the future accidents or collisions between ships carrying oil, chemical or radioactive substances, endangering seriously the regional ecosystem? © 2005 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.