Most studies on compound processing were performed in English and Dutch, languages that admit only head-final compounds: as a consequence, the effect of headedness might have been confounded with that of constituent position (but see [1]). Italian is ideally suited to address this issue, as Noun-Noun compounds can be either head-initial or head-final, with neither structure being clearly dominant over the other. The present study aims at disentangling the roles of semantic transparency, headedness and constituent position in the processing of Italian compound nouns. Thirty-two neurologically intact subjects participated in a priming experiment (SOA=300ms) with a lexical decision task. Forty-eight Noun-Noun compounds were selected as probes; they were either transparent or opaque (e.g., fotocopia, photocopy, vs boccaporto, hatch, lit. mouth+harbour) and head-initial or head-final (e.g., fotocopia vs capobanda, ring-leader, lit. chief+gang). The four groups of probes were matched for length, surface frequency and stem frequency. Each compound probe was primed by both its initial and its final constituent in separate runs; constituent primes were matched with orthographically similar control words (e.g., capo, chief vs. caso, chance) for length, surface frequency, stem frequency and orthographic neighbourhood. The ANOVA showed a first-level priming effect, with no significant interaction. The planned-comparison t-tests showed a facilitation effect with all types of compounds, which however is modulated by headedness and constituent position, i.e. there is no difference when the head or the modifier were primed in head-initial compounds, while the head elicited a greater effect in head-final compounds (see Figure). The presence of a priming effect with all kinds of targets suggests that constituents of Italian Noun-Noun compounds are automatically accessed, independently of semantic transparency, constituent position and headedness. However, the latter two factors do modulate constituent priming, with greater effects elicited by the morphological head in head-final compounds; this indicates that while head-final compounds have a hierarchical head-modifier representation, head-initial compounds do not. REFERENCE [1] Jarema G. et al. (1999). Processing compounds: A crosslinguistic study. Brain and Language, 68, 362–369.

Crepaldi, D., Marelli, M., Luzzatti, C. (2008). Mental representation and processing of nominal compounds: evidence from constituent priming in Italian. Intervento presentato a: Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Cambridge, UK.

Mental representation and processing of nominal compounds: evidence from constituent priming in Italian

CREPALDI, DAVIDE;MARELLI, MARCO;LUZZATTI, CLAUDIO GIUSEPPE
2008

Abstract

Most studies on compound processing were performed in English and Dutch, languages that admit only head-final compounds: as a consequence, the effect of headedness might have been confounded with that of constituent position (but see [1]). Italian is ideally suited to address this issue, as Noun-Noun compounds can be either head-initial or head-final, with neither structure being clearly dominant over the other. The present study aims at disentangling the roles of semantic transparency, headedness and constituent position in the processing of Italian compound nouns. Thirty-two neurologically intact subjects participated in a priming experiment (SOA=300ms) with a lexical decision task. Forty-eight Noun-Noun compounds were selected as probes; they were either transparent or opaque (e.g., fotocopia, photocopy, vs boccaporto, hatch, lit. mouth+harbour) and head-initial or head-final (e.g., fotocopia vs capobanda, ring-leader, lit. chief+gang). The four groups of probes were matched for length, surface frequency and stem frequency. Each compound probe was primed by both its initial and its final constituent in separate runs; constituent primes were matched with orthographically similar control words (e.g., capo, chief vs. caso, chance) for length, surface frequency, stem frequency and orthographic neighbourhood. The ANOVA showed a first-level priming effect, with no significant interaction. The planned-comparison t-tests showed a facilitation effect with all types of compounds, which however is modulated by headedness and constituent position, i.e. there is no difference when the head or the modifier were primed in head-initial compounds, while the head elicited a greater effect in head-final compounds (see Figure). The presence of a priming effect with all kinds of targets suggests that constituents of Italian Noun-Noun compounds are automatically accessed, independently of semantic transparency, constituent position and headedness. However, the latter two factors do modulate constituent priming, with greater effects elicited by the morphological head in head-final compounds; this indicates that while head-final compounds have a hierarchical head-modifier representation, head-initial compounds do not. REFERENCE [1] Jarema G. et al. (1999). Processing compounds: A crosslinguistic study. Brain and Language, 68, 362–369.
abstract + poster
compound nouns; headedness; constituent priming; lexical morphology
English
Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing
2008
5-set-2008
none
Crepaldi, D., Marelli, M., Luzzatti, C. (2008). Mental representation and processing of nominal compounds: evidence from constituent priming in Italian. Intervento presentato a: Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, Cambridge, UK.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/20489
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact