This article explores the functioning of Lombardy's networked employment services system, inspired by quasi-market and horizontal subsidiarity principles, and specifically addresses a gap in the quasi-market literature, where little attention is devoted to the role played by institutions at lower levels of government. A qualitative study of the Lombardy system, with a focus on the municipality of Milan, is relied upon in order to explore the extent to which the principles of quasi-market and multi-level governance pursued by the regional government are allowed to co-exist in practice. Here, sub-regional levels of government are directly involved in services provision, but enjoy a more privileged condition relative to the private providers, thereby jeopardizing the implementation of an effective quasi-market. The article contributes to existing theories by suggesting that horizontal subsidiarity and marketization cannot neglect multi-level governance in those sectors where public bodies at various levels of government are directly involved in implementation.
Trivellato, B., Bassoli, M., Catalano, S. (2017). Can Quasi-market and Multi-level Governance Co-exist? Insights from the Case of Lombardy's Employment Services System. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 51(5), 697-718 [10.1111/spol.12176].
Can Quasi-market and Multi-level Governance Co-exist? Insights from the Case of Lombardy's Employment Services System
Trivellato, B
;
2017
Abstract
This article explores the functioning of Lombardy's networked employment services system, inspired by quasi-market and horizontal subsidiarity principles, and specifically addresses a gap in the quasi-market literature, where little attention is devoted to the role played by institutions at lower levels of government. A qualitative study of the Lombardy system, with a focus on the municipality of Milan, is relied upon in order to explore the extent to which the principles of quasi-market and multi-level governance pursued by the regional government are allowed to co-exist in practice. Here, sub-regional levels of government are directly involved in services provision, but enjoy a more privileged condition relative to the private providers, thereby jeopardizing the implementation of an effective quasi-market. The article contributes to existing theories by suggesting that horizontal subsidiarity and marketization cannot neglect multi-level governance in those sectors where public bodies at various levels of government are directly involved in implementation.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.