The conditions and the specificity by which an antibody binds to its target protein in routinely fixed and embedded tissues are unknown. Direct methods, such as staining in a knock-out animal or in vitro peptide scanning of the epitope, are costly and impractical. We aimed to elucidate antibody specificity and binding conditions using tissue staining and public genomic and immunological databases by comparing human and pig—the farmed mammal evolutionarily closest to humans besides apes. We used a database of 146 anti-human antibodies and found that antibodies tolerate partially conserved amino acid substitutions but not changes in target accessibility, as defined by epitope prediction algorithms. Some epitopes are sensitive to fixation and embedding in a species-specific fashion. We also find that half of the antibodies stain porcine tissue epitopes that have 60% to 100% similarity to human tissue at the amino acid sequence level. The reason why the remaining antibodies fail to stain the tissues remains elusive. Because of its similarity with the human, pig tissue offers a convenient tissue for quality control in immunohistochemistry, within and across laboratories, and an interesting model to investigate antibody specificity.

Scalia, C., Gendusa, R., Basciu, M., Riva, L., Tusa, L., Musarò, A., et al. (2015). Epitope Recognition in the Human–Pig Comparison Model on Fixed and Embedded Material. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 63(10), 805-822 [10.1369/0022155415597738].

Epitope Recognition in the Human–Pig Comparison Model on Fixed and Embedded Material

CATTORETTI, GIORGIO
Penultimo
;
Bolognesi, M.
2015

Abstract

The conditions and the specificity by which an antibody binds to its target protein in routinely fixed and embedded tissues are unknown. Direct methods, such as staining in a knock-out animal or in vitro peptide scanning of the epitope, are costly and impractical. We aimed to elucidate antibody specificity and binding conditions using tissue staining and public genomic and immunological databases by comparing human and pig—the farmed mammal evolutionarily closest to humans besides apes. We used a database of 146 anti-human antibodies and found that antibodies tolerate partially conserved amino acid substitutions but not changes in target accessibility, as defined by epitope prediction algorithms. Some epitopes are sensitive to fixation and embedding in a species-specific fashion. We also find that half of the antibodies stain porcine tissue epitopes that have 60% to 100% similarity to human tissue at the amino acid sequence level. The reason why the remaining antibodies fail to stain the tissues remains elusive. Because of its similarity with the human, pig tissue offers a convenient tissue for quality control in immunohistochemistry, within and across laboratories, and an interesting model to investigate antibody specificity.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
antigen; epitope; immunohistochemistry; quality control; swine; Anatomy; Histology
English
2015
63
10
805
822
open
Scalia, C., Gendusa, R., Basciu, M., Riva, L., Tusa, L., Musarò, A., et al. (2015). Epitope Recognition in the Human–Pig Comparison Model on Fixed and Embedded Material. JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY, 63(10), 805-822 [10.1369/0022155415597738].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10281-94320.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Dimensione 1.45 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.45 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/94320
Citazioni
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
Social impact