The cerebellum is involved in motor learning of new procedures both during actual execution of a motor task and during observational training. These processes are thought to depend on the activity of a neural network that involves the lateral cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1). In this study, we used a twin-coil TMS technique to investigate whether execution and observation of a visuomotor procedural learning task is related to modulation of cerebello-motor connectivity. We observed that, at rest, a magnetic conditioning pulse applied over the lateral cerebellum reduced the motor-evoked potentials obtained by stimulating the contralateral M1, indicating activation of a cerebello-motor connection. Furthermore, during procedural learning, cerebellar stimulation resulted in selective facilitation, not inhibition, of contralateral M1 excitability. The effects were evident when motor learning was obtained by actual execution of the task or by observation, but they disappeared if procedural learning had already been acquired by previous observational training. These results indicate that changes in cerebello-motor connectivity occur in relation to specific phases of procedural learning, demonstrating a complex pattern of excitatory and inhibitory drives modulated across time. © 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Torriero, S., Oliveri, M., Koch, G., LO GERFO, E., Salerno, S., Ferlazzo, F., et al. (2011). Changes in cerebello-motor connectivity during procedural learning by actual execution and observation. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 23(2), 338-348 [10.1162/jocn.2010.21471].

Changes in cerebello-motor connectivity during procedural learning by actual execution and observation

Torriero, Sara
;
LO GERFO, EMANUELE;
2011

Abstract

The cerebellum is involved in motor learning of new procedures both during actual execution of a motor task and during observational training. These processes are thought to depend on the activity of a neural network that involves the lateral cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1). In this study, we used a twin-coil TMS technique to investigate whether execution and observation of a visuomotor procedural learning task is related to modulation of cerebello-motor connectivity. We observed that, at rest, a magnetic conditioning pulse applied over the lateral cerebellum reduced the motor-evoked potentials obtained by stimulating the contralateral M1, indicating activation of a cerebello-motor connection. Furthermore, during procedural learning, cerebellar stimulation resulted in selective facilitation, not inhibition, of contralateral M1 excitability. The effects were evident when motor learning was obtained by actual execution of the task or by observation, but they disappeared if procedural learning had already been acquired by previous observational training. These results indicate that changes in cerebello-motor connectivity occur in relation to specific phases of procedural learning, demonstrating a complex pattern of excitatory and inhibitory drives modulated across time. © 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Adult; Analysis of Variance; Brain Mapping; Cerebellum; Electromyography; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Female; Humans; Learning; Male; Motor Activity; Motor Cortex; Neural Pathways; Reaction Time; Time Factors; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Young Adult; Observation; Cognitive Neuroscience
English
2011
23
2
338
348
none
Torriero, S., Oliveri, M., Koch, G., LO GERFO, E., Salerno, S., Ferlazzo, F., et al. (2011). Changes in cerebello-motor connectivity during procedural learning by actual execution and observation. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 23(2), 338-348 [10.1162/jocn.2010.21471].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/66246
Citazioni
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
Social impact