In this squib we elaborate on the proposal that perché (‘why’) does not leave a trace inside the IP and argue that this peculiarity explains the absence of free relatives introduced by ‘why’ as well as some order restrictions concerning reason clauses. We also discuss why many languages, but not Italian, distinguish between ‘why’ and ‘because’.

Cecchetto, C., Donati, C. (2012). "Perché" Rizzi is right. In V. Bianchi, C. Chesi (a cura di), ENJOY LINGUISTICS! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Siena : CISCL Press.

"Perché" Rizzi is right

CECCHETTO, CARLO;
2012

Abstract

In this squib we elaborate on the proposal that perché (‘why’) does not leave a trace inside the IP and argue that this peculiarity explains the absence of free relatives introduced by ‘why’ as well as some order restrictions concerning reason clauses. We also discuss why many languages, but not Italian, distinguish between ‘why’ and ‘because’.
Capitolo o saggio
Interrogatves, wh-movement
English
ENJOY LINGUISTICS! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday
Bianchi, V; Chesi, C
2012
9788890794308
CISCL Press
Cecchetto, C., Donati, C. (2012). "Perché" Rizzi is right. In V. Bianchi, C. Chesi (a cura di), ENJOY LINGUISTICS! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Siena : CISCL Press.
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/65893
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact