Background: Delirium is clinically classified into hypoactive or hyperactive motoric subtypes, which may have different responses to treatment. We assessed heterogeneity in treatment effects according to baseline motoric subtype in the AID-ICU trial, which randomised adult ICU patients with delirium to haloperidol versus placebo. Methods: In this post hoc study of the AID-ICU trial, we used adjusted Bayesian linear and logistic regression models to assess potential differential effects of haloperidol on 90-day outcomes according to motor subtypes. Effect estimates are reported as absolute differences within and between subtypes (mean differences (MD)/risk differences (RD) and differences in MDs/RDs), with probabilities of any benefit, any harm and differential effects between subtypes. Results: Of 987 participants, 540 (54.7%) had hypoactive and 447 (45.3%) had hyperactive delirium at randomisation. Haloperidol was associated with more days alive out of hospital in both subgroups, with a 76.5% probability of a larger intervention effect in those with hyperactive delirium (difference in MDs 2.9 days; 95% CrI -4.8 to 10.6). Similar results were obtained for days alive without delirium/coma and days alive without mechanical ventilation. Haloperidol was associated with lower mortality in both subgroups, with a 73% probability of larger benefit in hyperactive delirium (difference in RDs -3.7%-points; 95% CrI -15.3 to 7.8). We found no relevant differences in serious adverse reactions or use of rescue medications. Conclusion: Compared with placebo, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with moderate probabilities of greater effects in hyperactive delirium. Further research is warranted to confirm these results. Editorial comment: In this post hoc analysis of the AID-ICU trial, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with a tendency towards greater treatment effects in hyperactive delirium. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03392376; EudraCT number, 2017-003829-15

Andersen‐ranberg, N., Poulsen, L., Perner, A., Hästbacka, J., Morgan, M., Citerio, G., et al. (2026). Haloperidol for Hypoactive and Hyperactive Delirium in ICU Patients—A Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of the AID‐ICU Trial. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 70(9 (October 2026)) [10.1111/aas.70336].

Haloperidol for Hypoactive and Hyperactive Delirium in ICU Patients—A Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of the AID‐ICU Trial

Citerio, Giuseppe;
2026

Abstract

Background: Delirium is clinically classified into hypoactive or hyperactive motoric subtypes, which may have different responses to treatment. We assessed heterogeneity in treatment effects according to baseline motoric subtype in the AID-ICU trial, which randomised adult ICU patients with delirium to haloperidol versus placebo. Methods: In this post hoc study of the AID-ICU trial, we used adjusted Bayesian linear and logistic regression models to assess potential differential effects of haloperidol on 90-day outcomes according to motor subtypes. Effect estimates are reported as absolute differences within and between subtypes (mean differences (MD)/risk differences (RD) and differences in MDs/RDs), with probabilities of any benefit, any harm and differential effects between subtypes. Results: Of 987 participants, 540 (54.7%) had hypoactive and 447 (45.3%) had hyperactive delirium at randomisation. Haloperidol was associated with more days alive out of hospital in both subgroups, with a 76.5% probability of a larger intervention effect in those with hyperactive delirium (difference in MDs 2.9 days; 95% CrI -4.8 to 10.6). Similar results were obtained for days alive without delirium/coma and days alive without mechanical ventilation. Haloperidol was associated with lower mortality in both subgroups, with a 73% probability of larger benefit in hyperactive delirium (difference in RDs -3.7%-points; 95% CrI -15.3 to 7.8). We found no relevant differences in serious adverse reactions or use of rescue medications. Conclusion: Compared with placebo, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with moderate probabilities of greater effects in hyperactive delirium. Further research is warranted to confirm these results. Editorial comment: In this post hoc analysis of the AID-ICU trial, haloperidol was associated with moderate to high probabilities of benefit in both hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, with a tendency towards greater treatment effects in hyperactive delirium. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03392376; EudraCT number, 2017-003829-15
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Delirium , ICU, haloperidol
English
18-set-2026
2026
70
9 (October 2026)
e70336
open
Andersen‐ranberg, N., Poulsen, L., Perner, A., Hästbacka, J., Morgan, M., Citerio, G., et al. (2026). Haloperidol for Hypoactive and Hyperactive Delirium in ICU Patients—A Post Hoc Bayesian Analysis of the AID‐ICU Trial. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 70(9 (October 2026)) [10.1111/aas.70336].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Andersen‐Ranberg et al-2026-Acta Anaesthesiol Scand-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 561.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
561.03 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/626602
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact