Background: – Posterior-superior (PS) laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) are generally considered the last step of the learning curve (LC). Current literature supports the approach of PS LLR after the completion of a long anterolateral (AL) LC. However, the skills needed for PS LLR are not all achievable with AL LLR. The aim of this study is to explore a new concept of LC for LLR in which AL and PS resection are approached simultaneously. Methods: – This is a retrospective study analyzing LLR performed between 2017 and 2024. PS and AL LLR were approached simultaneously. Two groups of PS and AL LLR were compared, using the textbook outcomes (TO) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, conversion, and vascular accidents. Results: – The study compares 2 similar groups of 69 PS LLR and 146 AL LLR. PS LLR proved to be longer operations with a higher rate of conversion, but equal in major complications. No significant difference in TO achievement and no major vascular accidents in the PS group were recorded. Discussion: – In conclusion, in LLR LC, the simultaneous approach of PS and AL liver resections is safe and feasible. PS LLR are challenging procedures but the achievement of optimal textbook outcome is noninferior to their AL counterpart.

Fogliati, A., Ciulli, C., Carissimi, F., Scacchi, A., Scotti, M., Adjei Antwi, S., et al. (2026). Laparoscopic Liver Resections: Are Postero-Superior Liver Segments Really the Last Step of the Learning Curve?. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES [10.1097/SLE.0000000000001460].

Laparoscopic Liver Resections: Are Postero-Superior Liver Segments Really the Last Step of the Learning Curve?

Adjei Antwi S. K.;Romano F.;
2026

Abstract

Background: – Posterior-superior (PS) laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) are generally considered the last step of the learning curve (LC). Current literature supports the approach of PS LLR after the completion of a long anterolateral (AL) LC. However, the skills needed for PS LLR are not all achievable with AL LLR. The aim of this study is to explore a new concept of LC for LLR in which AL and PS resection are approached simultaneously. Methods: – This is a retrospective study analyzing LLR performed between 2017 and 2024. PS and AL LLR were approached simultaneously. Two groups of PS and AL LLR were compared, using the textbook outcomes (TO) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were morbidity, conversion, and vascular accidents. Results: – The study compares 2 similar groups of 69 PS LLR and 146 AL LLR. PS LLR proved to be longer operations with a higher rate of conversion, but equal in major complications. No significant difference in TO achievement and no major vascular accidents in the PS group were recorded. Discussion: – In conclusion, in LLR LC, the simultaneous approach of PS and AL liver resections is safe and feasible. PS LLR are challenging procedures but the achievement of optimal textbook outcome is noninferior to their AL counterpart.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
CRLM; HCC; laparoscopy; learning curve; liver surgery; minimally invasive;
English
2-apr-2026
2026
reserved
Fogliati, A., Ciulli, C., Carissimi, F., Scacchi, A., Scotti, M., Adjei Antwi, S., et al. (2026). Laparoscopic Liver Resections: Are Postero-Superior Liver Segments Really the Last Step of the Learning Curve?. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES [10.1097/SLE.0000000000001460].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fogliati et al-2026-Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 474.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
474.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/618221
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact