This paper examines Italian Constitutional Court judgment no. 204/2025, which defined the constitutional limits of regional legislation on medically assisted suicide (MAS) in its review of Tuscany Regional Law no. 16/2025. It highlights several strengths of the decision, while also identifying important unresolved issues. The Court affirms the concurrent regional competence in the protection of health, thereby allowing procedural gaps arising from the absence of national legislation to be addressed without encroaching fundamental rights. Nevertheless, problematic issues remain, particularly regarding the implementation of MAS, including its characterisation as an enforceable procedure that does not qualify as the provision of medical treatment and the distinction drawn between MAS and euthanasia in the strict sense. The analysis shows how these issues raise significant questions for legal theory and contribute to a necessary interdisciplinary debate.

Forni, L. (2026). Suicidio medicalmente assistito e interventi normativi regionali: alcuni pregi – e alcune questioni irrisolte- della sentenza della Corte costituzionale n. 204/2025. NOTIZIE DI POLITEIA(162), 27-44.

Suicidio medicalmente assistito e interventi normativi regionali: alcuni pregi – e alcune questioni irrisolte- della sentenza della Corte costituzionale n. 204/2025.

Forni, L.
2026

Abstract

This paper examines Italian Constitutional Court judgment no. 204/2025, which defined the constitutional limits of regional legislation on medically assisted suicide (MAS) in its review of Tuscany Regional Law no. 16/2025. It highlights several strengths of the decision, while also identifying important unresolved issues. The Court affirms the concurrent regional competence in the protection of health, thereby allowing procedural gaps arising from the absence of national legislation to be addressed without encroaching fundamental rights. Nevertheless, problematic issues remain, particularly regarding the implementation of MAS, including its characterisation as an enforceable procedure that does not qualify as the provision of medical treatment and the distinction drawn between MAS and euthanasia in the strict sense. The analysis shows how these issues raise significant questions for legal theory and contribute to a necessary interdisciplinary debate.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Medically Assisted Suicide, Italian Constitutional Court, Euthanasia, Individual Self-Determination, Legal Analysis
Italian
2026
162
27
44
reserved
Forni, L. (2026). Suicidio medicalmente assistito e interventi normativi regionali: alcuni pregi – e alcune questioni irrisolte- della sentenza della Corte costituzionale n. 204/2025. NOTIZIE DI POLITEIA(162), 27-44.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Politeia_162_Forni (2) (1).pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Descrizione: Saggio Forni Politeia 2026-162 su SMA e Corte costituzionale
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 741.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
741.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/614423
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact