Background: Piperacillin/tazobactam is frequently used empirically in patients subsequently diagnosed with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacterales, yet its effectiveness remains uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to compare piperacillin/tazobactam with carbapenems as empirical therapy for BSIs caused by ESBL-Enterobacterales. Methods: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted at Niguarda Hospital in Milan,Italy, enrolling consecutive patients with BSIs caused by ESBL-Enterobacterales treated empirically with either piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems from January 2015 to December 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Propensity Score Matching(PSM) was employed to mitigate potential confounding factors when assessing the association between empirical therapy and mortality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the role of definitive piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems on patient outcomes. Results: A total of 264 patients were included in the study, median age was 72[64–81], 64% were males, 66% had sepsis and 17% septic shock. Among them, 200(76%) received empirical piperacillin/tazobactam and 64(24%) received carbapenems. After PSM adjustment, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the groups. Patients who received empirical piperacillin/tazobactam had a higher in-hospital mortality compared to those receiving empirical carbapenems (14.3% vs 3.5%, adjusted Risk Difference: 10%;95%CI: 2–19%). No difference in in-hospital mortality was observed when comparing definitive piperacillin/tazobactam to definitive carbapenems (6% vs 9%, Risk Difference: −2.5%; 95%CI: −9.2 − 4.2). Conclusion: Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with higher mortality compared tocarbapenemswhen treating patients with BSI due to ESBL-Enterobacterales. Further larger studies are needed to confirm the results andto identify specific scenarios in which piperacillin/tazobactam may be safely used.

Capsoni, N., Bettina, M., Bellone, B., Bossi, I., Cantu, L., Rossmann, M., et al. (2026). Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems to treat bloodstream infections due to ESBL enterobacterales: a propensity score-matched observational study conducted in an emergency department in Northern Italy. INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 58(5), 495-506 [10.1080/23744235.2025.2600010].

Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems to treat bloodstream infections due to ESBL enterobacterales: a propensity score-matched observational study conducted in an emergency department in Northern Italy

Rossmann M.;Scarnera M.;Bernasconi D. P.;Puoti M.;
2026

Abstract

Background: Piperacillin/tazobactam is frequently used empirically in patients subsequently diagnosed with bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacterales, yet its effectiveness remains uncertain. Objective: This study aimed to compare piperacillin/tazobactam with carbapenems as empirical therapy for BSIs caused by ESBL-Enterobacterales. Methods: A single-centre retrospective study was conducted at Niguarda Hospital in Milan,Italy, enrolling consecutive patients with BSIs caused by ESBL-Enterobacterales treated empirically with either piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems from January 2015 to December 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Propensity Score Matching(PSM) was employed to mitigate potential confounding factors when assessing the association between empirical therapy and mortality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the role of definitive piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenems on patient outcomes. Results: A total of 264 patients were included in the study, median age was 72[64–81], 64% were males, 66% had sepsis and 17% septic shock. Among them, 200(76%) received empirical piperacillin/tazobactam and 64(24%) received carbapenems. After PSM adjustment, baseline characteristics were well balanced between the groups. Patients who received empirical piperacillin/tazobactam had a higher in-hospital mortality compared to those receiving empirical carbapenems (14.3% vs 3.5%, adjusted Risk Difference: 10%;95%CI: 2–19%). No difference in in-hospital mortality was observed when comparing definitive piperacillin/tazobactam to definitive carbapenems (6% vs 9%, Risk Difference: −2.5%; 95%CI: −9.2 − 4.2). Conclusion: Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam may be associated with higher mortality compared tocarbapenemswhen treating patients with BSI due to ESBL-Enterobacterales. Further larger studies are needed to confirm the results andto identify specific scenarios in which piperacillin/tazobactam may be safely used.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
antibacterial drug resistance; beta-Lactams; enterobacteriaceae; Sepsis; septic shock;
English
15-dic-2025
2026
58
5
495
506
none
Capsoni, N., Bettina, M., Bellone, B., Bossi, I., Cantu, L., Rossmann, M., et al. (2026). Empirical piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems to treat bloodstream infections due to ESBL enterobacterales: a propensity score-matched observational study conducted in an emergency department in Northern Italy. INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 58(5), 495-506 [10.1080/23744235.2025.2600010].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/608071
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact