Sepsis is a complex life-threatening condition involving immune dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and multi organ failure. To investigate molecular and systemic processes driving disease progression, in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo experimental methods have been developed. While these systems have advanced understanding of immune activation, cytokine signalling, and organ injury, differences in complexity, reproducibility, and alignment with human pathophysiology have limited the translation of many promising preclinical findings into clinical success. This review examines current literature on sepsis systems, evaluating them in terms of biological complexity, reproducibility, ethical constraints, and clinical applicability. In parallel, it discusses the potential use of microfluidic technology, particularly organ-on-chip, in replicating human physiology and capturing key features of sepsis. By comparing conventional and advanced systems, this review outlines challenges in sepsis research and identifies key directions for a more integrated approach to sepsis modelling, aiming to improve translational outcomes and therapeutic discovery. We aim to provide a structured basis for comparing models when selecting approaches for a given question or candidate therapy. Copyright (c) 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Silva, M., Fehrenbach, G., Pogue, R., Murray, P., Rezoagli, E., Laffey, J., et al. (2026). Sepsis modelling: current approaches and organ-on-chip perspectives. EBIOMEDICINE, 125(March 2026) [10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106120].

Sepsis modelling: current approaches and organ-on-chip perspectives

Rezoagli E.;
2026

Abstract

Sepsis is a complex life-threatening condition involving immune dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and multi organ failure. To investigate molecular and systemic processes driving disease progression, in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo experimental methods have been developed. While these systems have advanced understanding of immune activation, cytokine signalling, and organ injury, differences in complexity, reproducibility, and alignment with human pathophysiology have limited the translation of many promising preclinical findings into clinical success. This review examines current literature on sepsis systems, evaluating them in terms of biological complexity, reproducibility, ethical constraints, and clinical applicability. In parallel, it discusses the potential use of microfluidic technology, particularly organ-on-chip, in replicating human physiology and capturing key features of sepsis. By comparing conventional and advanced systems, this review outlines challenges in sepsis research and identifies key directions for a more integrated approach to sepsis modelling, aiming to improve translational outcomes and therapeutic discovery. We aim to provide a structured basis for comparing models when selecting approaches for a given question or candidate therapy. Copyright (c) 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
Experimental models; Microfluidic systems; Organ-on-chip; Sepsis; Translational relevance;
English
13-feb-2026
2026
125
March 2026
106120
open
Silva, M., Fehrenbach, G., Pogue, R., Murray, P., Rezoagli, E., Laffey, J., et al. (2026). Sepsis modelling: current approaches and organ-on-chip perspectives. EBIOMEDICINE, 125(March 2026) [10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106120].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Silva et al-2026-eBioMedicine-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 1.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.78 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/602644
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact