Knowledge organization systems (KOSs), such as term lists, thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies, play a fundamental role in categorizing, managing, and retrieving information. In the academic domain, KOSs are often adopted for representing research areas and their relationships, primarily aiming to classify research articles, academic courses, patents, books, scientific venues, domain experts, grants, software, experiment materials, and several other relevant products and agents. These structured representations of research areas, widely embraced by many academic fields, have proven effective in empowering AI-based systems to enhance the retrievability of relevant documents, enable advanced analytic solutions to quantify the impact of academic research, and analyze and forecast research dynamics. We aim to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic disciplines. We analyzed and compared 45 KOSs according to five main dimensions: scope, structure, curation, usage, and links to other KOSs. Our results reveal a very heterogeneous scenario in terms of scope, scale, quality, and usage, highlighting the need for more integrated solutions for representing research knowledge across academic fields. We conclude by discussing the main challenges and the most promising future directions.

Salatino, A., Aggarwal, T., Mannocci, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E. (2025). A survey of knowledge organization systems of research fields: Resources and challenges. QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 6, 567-610 [10.1162/qss_a_00363].

A survey of knowledge organization systems of research fields: Resources and challenges

Osborne F.;
2025

Abstract

Knowledge organization systems (KOSs), such as term lists, thesauri, taxonomies, and ontologies, play a fundamental role in categorizing, managing, and retrieving information. In the academic domain, KOSs are often adopted for representing research areas and their relationships, primarily aiming to classify research articles, academic courses, patents, books, scientific venues, domain experts, grants, software, experiment materials, and several other relevant products and agents. These structured representations of research areas, widely embraced by many academic fields, have proven effective in empowering AI-based systems to enhance the retrievability of relevant documents, enable advanced analytic solutions to quantify the impact of academic research, and analyze and forecast research dynamics. We aim to present a comprehensive survey of the current KOS for academic disciplines. We analyzed and compared 45 KOSs according to five main dimensions: scope, structure, curation, usage, and links to other KOSs. Our results reveal a very heterogeneous scenario in terms of scope, scale, quality, and usage, highlighting the need for more integrated solutions for representing research knowledge across academic fields. We conclude by discussing the main challenges and the most promising future directions.
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
controlled vocabularies; digital libraries; knowledge organization systems; scholarly knowledge; scholarly ontologies; taxonomies;
English
20-giu-2025
2025
6
567
610
open
Salatino, A., Aggarwal, T., Mannocci, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E. (2025). A survey of knowledge organization systems of research fields: Resources and challenges. QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE STUDIES, 6, 567-610 [10.1162/qss_a_00363].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Salatino et al-2025-Quantitative Science Studies-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 1.86 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.86 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/595181
Citazioni
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
Social impact