The article examines the challenges that climate change poses to the international legal regime for the protection of biodiversity, framing the climate crisis as a legally destabilizing phenomenon. Based on a normative and systemic analysis of the main environmental treaties, combined with doctrinal contributions and the decision-making practice of the Conferences of the Parties (COPs) and international courts, the study identifies two central weaknesses in the current legal architecture. The first stems from the conservative character of biodiversity norms, which seek to preserve a static ecological state, at odds with the transformations induced by climate change; the second concerns the normative fragmentation between the biodiversity and climate change regimes. In light of this diagnosis, the study highlights the need to incorporate ecosystembased adaptation strategies and to acknowledge the interpretative role of COP decisions as instruments of soft law and subsequent interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Furthermore, it advocates a systemic and integrated interpretation of environmental treaties, pursuant to Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, in order to harmonize obligations and prevent contradictions. The article concludes that only a dynamic, interconnected, and adaptive reading of international environmental law can ensure the effective protection of biodiversity in the face of the escalating climate crisis.
Mageste Castelar Campos, B. (2025). Os Desafios Jurídicos da Proteção Internacional da Biodiversidade diante da Crise Climática. REVISTA DA FACULDADE DE DIREITO - UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE MINAS GERAIS, 87(87), 41-53 [10.12818/p.0304-2340.2025v87p41].
Os Desafios Jurídicos da Proteção Internacional da Biodiversidade diante da Crise Climática
Mageste Castelar Campos, B
2025
Abstract
The article examines the challenges that climate change poses to the international legal regime for the protection of biodiversity, framing the climate crisis as a legally destabilizing phenomenon. Based on a normative and systemic analysis of the main environmental treaties, combined with doctrinal contributions and the decision-making practice of the Conferences of the Parties (COPs) and international courts, the study identifies two central weaknesses in the current legal architecture. The first stems from the conservative character of biodiversity norms, which seek to preserve a static ecological state, at odds with the transformations induced by climate change; the second concerns the normative fragmentation between the biodiversity and climate change regimes. In light of this diagnosis, the study highlights the need to incorporate ecosystembased adaptation strategies and to acknowledge the interpretative role of COP decisions as instruments of soft law and subsequent interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Furthermore, it advocates a systemic and integrated interpretation of environmental treaties, pursuant to Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention, in order to harmonize obligations and prevent contradictions. The article concludes that only a dynamic, interconnected, and adaptive reading of international environmental law can ensure the effective protection of biodiversity in the face of the escalating climate crisis.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mageste Castelar Campos-2025-Rev Fac Direito-VoR.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Licenza open access specifica dell’editore
Dimensione
266.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
266.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


