This study examines environmental indicators’ validity by testing whether the disaggregated environmental metrics outperform the aggregated score in explaining financial solvency. We extracted ESG data of pharmaceutical and chemical companies from the MSCI and Orbis BvD databases in the period from 2013 to 2022. We employed fixed-effects panel regressions to analyse the relationship between environmental performance measures and financial measures of corporate solvency. Our results suggest that while aggregate environmental scores do not predict financial solvency, while measures of management efforts to address material environmental risks positively influence solvency. However, the influence varies across industries, with significant and consistent associations observed in the pharmaceutical sector but not in the chemical sector. These findings highlight the importance of industry-specific sustainability metrics in understanding the complex relationship between ESG issues and financial performance.

Calciolari, S., Ruberti, M. (2025). Why Go Industry-Specific with ESG Indicators? Testing their Validity and Explanatory Power for Financial Performance. In N. Castellano, F. De Luca, G. D'Onza, M. Maffei, M. Melis (a cura di), Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Risk, Performance, Monitoring (pp. 545-566). Springer Nature Switzerland [10.1007/978-3-031-76618-3_26].

Why Go Industry-Specific with ESG Indicators? Testing their Validity and Explanatory Power for Financial Performance

Calciolari S.;Ruberti M.
2025

Abstract

This study examines environmental indicators’ validity by testing whether the disaggregated environmental metrics outperform the aggregated score in explaining financial solvency. We extracted ESG data of pharmaceutical and chemical companies from the MSCI and Orbis BvD databases in the period from 2013 to 2022. We employed fixed-effects panel regressions to analyse the relationship between environmental performance measures and financial measures of corporate solvency. Our results suggest that while aggregate environmental scores do not predict financial solvency, while measures of management efforts to address material environmental risks positively influence solvency. However, the influence varies across industries, with significant and consistent associations observed in the pharmaceutical sector but not in the chemical sector. These findings highlight the importance of industry-specific sustainability metrics in understanding the complex relationship between ESG issues and financial performance.
Capitolo o saggio
Aggregated/disaggregated metrics; Comparative analysis; Environmental sustainability; ESG Risk Management; Pharmaceutical industry;
English
Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Risk, Performance, Monitoring
Castellano, N; De Luca, F; D'Onza, G; Maffei, M; Melis, M
2025
9783031766176
213
Springer Nature Switzerland
545
566
Calciolari, S., Ruberti, M. (2025). Why Go Industry-Specific with ESG Indicators? Testing their Validity and Explanatory Power for Financial Performance. In N. Castellano, F. De Luca, G. D'Onza, M. Maffei, M. Melis (a cura di), Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Risk, Performance, Monitoring (pp. 545-566). Springer Nature Switzerland [10.1007/978-3-031-76618-3_26].
reserved
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Calciolari-2025-Environmental-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 22.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
22.25 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/573401
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact