Background: Technological progress in the field of prosthetic dentistry has changed the workflow, optimizing times and increasing the possible choices of prosthetic rehabilitation. Methods: The adaptability of three resin plates to the plaster model was evaluated by visual evaluation and by filling out a questionnaire in which two areas present in three silicone impressions obtained with three different construction methods were selected, including the traditional method, CAD/CAM method for milling, and CAD/CAM method for addition. Results: The results showed that although silicone 3 obtained with the additive method had better performances in the selected areas, the p-value of 0.735 was >0.05, and therefore there are no statistically significant differences between the different silicone impressions. Furthermore, a poor agreement between the evaluators was found (k 0.184). Conclusions: This work conducted in vitro highlights an important aspect of the choice of material used for impressions in cases of prosthetic relining. More in-depth studies with larger samples and objective measurement methods will be needed to compare fit data across different prosthetic construction modalities.
Ceraulo, S., Barbarisi, A., Selvaggio, L., Caccianiga, G., Lauritano, D. (2025). Accuracy in the Plaster Model of Total Prosthetic Plates in Three Different Manufacturing Methods: In Vitro Study. PROSTHESIS, 7(2) [10.3390/prosthesis7020042].
Accuracy in the Plaster Model of Total Prosthetic Plates in Three Different Manufacturing Methods: In Vitro Study
Ceraulo, Saverio
Primo
;Barbarisi, AntonioSecondo
;Caccianiga, GianluigiPenultimo
;Lauritano, DorinaUltimo
2025
Abstract
Background: Technological progress in the field of prosthetic dentistry has changed the workflow, optimizing times and increasing the possible choices of prosthetic rehabilitation. Methods: The adaptability of three resin plates to the plaster model was evaluated by visual evaluation and by filling out a questionnaire in which two areas present in three silicone impressions obtained with three different construction methods were selected, including the traditional method, CAD/CAM method for milling, and CAD/CAM method for addition. Results: The results showed that although silicone 3 obtained with the additive method had better performances in the selected areas, the p-value of 0.735 was >0.05, and therefore there are no statistically significant differences between the different silicone impressions. Furthermore, a poor agreement between the evaluators was found (k 0.184). Conclusions: This work conducted in vitro highlights an important aspect of the choice of material used for impressions in cases of prosthetic relining. More in-depth studies with larger samples and objective measurement methods will be needed to compare fit data across different prosthetic construction modalities.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Ceraulo-2025-prosthesis-VoR.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Creative Commons
Dimensione
4.49 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.49 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.