Prophylactic use of hypervolemia and hypertension is believed to present an option to decrease the incidence of symptomatic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and improve neurologic outcome. A Medline literature search was conducted to review available evidence regarding volume management after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Quality of selected studies was evaluated, using the standardized GRADE system. Eleven studies focused on prophylactic hypervolemic therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were identified, including four randomized controlled trials. Available studies showed a large heterogeneity in physiologic treatment goals and interventions applied. The oldest and smallest randomized controlled trial suggested a positive effect, but had severe limitations in trial design. Neither of the other randomized controlled studies showed outcome benefit with hypervolemic therapy. Results from observational studies were not found to support the use of prophylactic hypervolemia and hypertension. Complication frequency was repeatedly reported to be higher with the application of prophylactic hypervolemia. In summary, prophylactic hyperdynamic therapy after subarachnoid hemorrhage has not been adequately shown to effectively raise cerebral blood flow or improve neurological outcome. In contrast, there is evidence for harm using overly aggressive hydration. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.

Wolf, S., Citerio, G. (2011). Routine management of volume status after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 15(2), 275-280 [10.1007/s12028-011-9593-9].

Routine management of volume status after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

CITERIO, GIUSEPPE
2011

Abstract

Prophylactic use of hypervolemia and hypertension is believed to present an option to decrease the incidence of symptomatic vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and improve neurologic outcome. A Medline literature search was conducted to review available evidence regarding volume management after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Quality of selected studies was evaluated, using the standardized GRADE system. Eleven studies focused on prophylactic hypervolemic therapy after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were identified, including four randomized controlled trials. Available studies showed a large heterogeneity in physiologic treatment goals and interventions applied. The oldest and smallest randomized controlled trial suggested a positive effect, but had severe limitations in trial design. Neither of the other randomized controlled studies showed outcome benefit with hypervolemic therapy. Results from observational studies were not found to support the use of prophylactic hypervolemia and hypertension. Complication frequency was repeatedly reported to be higher with the application of prophylactic hypervolemia. In summary, prophylactic hyperdynamic therapy after subarachnoid hemorrhage has not been adequately shown to effectively raise cerebral blood flow or improve neurological outcome. In contrast, there is evidence for harm using overly aggressive hydration. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Hypertension; Hypervolemia; Prophylactic treatment; Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Acute Disease; Critical Care; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Hypertension; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Blood Volume; Neurology (clinical); Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
English
2011
15
2
275
280
open
Wolf, S., Citerio, G. (2011). Routine management of volume status after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 15(2), 275-280 [10.1007/s12028-011-9593-9].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Neurocrit Care 2011 Wolf.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 172.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
172.98 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/54866
Citazioni
  • Scopus 23
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
Social impact