Although clinicians are generally advised to use prophylactic therapy to reduce the risk for developing deep venous thrombosis in patients after repair of ruptured aneurysms, limited data are available to guide specific therapeutic decisions. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify English-language articles that addressed prophylactic treatment for deep venous thrombosis after subarachnoid hemorrhage published between 1980 and March 2011. A total of 12 articles were included in this review, including seven original research studies and one meta-analysis. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis varied among studies, with the highest incidence reported with prospective ultrasound screening. Poor-grade patients are at highest risk. Mechanical prophylactic methods appear to be modestly effective as monotherapy, without significant risk for the typical patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Unfractionated heparin is moderately effective but carries a small risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Low molecular weight heparin has been linked to an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage. Limited data are available to direct the timing and duration of prophylactic therapies. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.

Vespa, P., Citerio, G. (2011). Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 15(2), 295-297 [10.1007/s12028-011-9599-3].

Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis

CITERIO, GIUSEPPE
Membro del Collaboration Group
2011

Abstract

Although clinicians are generally advised to use prophylactic therapy to reduce the risk for developing deep venous thrombosis in patients after repair of ruptured aneurysms, limited data are available to guide specific therapeutic decisions. An electronic literature search was conducted to identify English-language articles that addressed prophylactic treatment for deep venous thrombosis after subarachnoid hemorrhage published between 1980 and March 2011. A total of 12 articles were included in this review, including seven original research studies and one meta-analysis. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis varied among studies, with the highest incidence reported with prospective ultrasound screening. Poor-grade patients are at highest risk. Mechanical prophylactic methods appear to be modestly effective as monotherapy, without significant risk for the typical patient with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Unfractionated heparin is moderately effective but carries a small risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Low molecular weight heparin has been linked to an increased risk for intracranial hemorrhage. Limited data are available to direct the timing and duration of prophylactic therapies. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Anticoagulation; Heparin; Intracranial hemorrhage; Sequential compression devices; Acute Disease; Anticoagulants; Humans; Incidence; Intensive Care; Risk Factors; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Venous Thrombosis; Neurology (clinical); Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
English
2011
15
2
295
297
reserved
Vespa, P., Citerio, G. (2011). Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 15(2), 295-297 [10.1007/s12028-011-9599-3].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Neurocrit Care 2011 Vespa-2.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 144.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
144.37 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/54861
Citazioni
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
Social impact