We study the effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on employment across US commuting zones (CZs) over the period 2000-2020. A simple model shows that AI can automate jobs or complement workers, and illustrates how to estimate its effect by exploiting variation in a novel measure of local exposure to AI: job growth in AI-related professions built from detailed occupational data. Using a shift-share instrument that combines industry-level AI adoption with local industry employment, we estimate robust negative effects of AI exposure on employment across CZs and time. We find that AI's impact is different from other capital and technologies, and that it works through services more than manufacturing. Moreover, the employment effect is especially negative for low-skill and production workers, while it turns positive for workers at the top of the wage distribution and for those in STEM occupations. These results are consistent with the view that AI has contributed to the automation of jobs and to widen inequality.

Bonfiglioli, A., Crinò, R., Gancia, G., Papadakis, I. (2025). Artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from US commuting zones. ECONOMIC POLICY, 40(121 (January 2025)), 145-194 [10.1093/epolic/eiae059].

Artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from US commuting zones

Gancia, Gino
;
2025

Abstract

We study the effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on employment across US commuting zones (CZs) over the period 2000-2020. A simple model shows that AI can automate jobs or complement workers, and illustrates how to estimate its effect by exploiting variation in a novel measure of local exposure to AI: job growth in AI-related professions built from detailed occupational data. Using a shift-share instrument that combines industry-level AI adoption with local industry employment, we estimate robust negative effects of AI exposure on employment across CZs and time. We find that AI's impact is different from other capital and technologies, and that it works through services more than manufacturing. Moreover, the employment effect is especially negative for low-skill and production workers, while it turns positive for workers at the top of the wage distribution and for those in STEM occupations. These results are consistent with the view that AI has contributed to the automation of jobs and to widen inequality.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Artificial Intelligence; Jobs
English
25-nov-2024
2025
40
121 (January 2025)
145
194
mixed
Bonfiglioli, A., Crinò, R., Gancia, G., Papadakis, I. (2025). Artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from US commuting zones. ECONOMIC POLICY, 40(121 (January 2025)), 145-194 [10.1093/epolic/eiae059].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bonfiglioli-2025-Economic Policy-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 649.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
649.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Bonfiglioli-2025-Economic Policy-AAM.pdf

embargo fino al 25/11/2025

Descrizione: LICENZA - https://academic.oup.com/pages/self_archiving_policy_b
Tipologia di allegato: Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Licenza: Licenza open access specifica dell’editore
Dimensione 2.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.69 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/531282
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
Social impact