We study the effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on employment across US commuting zones (CZs) over the period 2000-2020. A simple model shows that AI can automate jobs or complement workers, and illustrates how to estimate its effect by exploiting variation in a novel measure of local exposure to AI: job growth in AI-related professions built from detailed occupational data. Using a shift-share instrument that combines industry-level AI adoption with local industry employment, we estimate robust negative effects of AI exposure on employment across CZs and time. We find that AI's impact is different from other capital and technologies, and that it works through services more than manufacturing. Moreover, the employment effect is especially negative for low-skill and production workers, while it turns positive for workers at the top of the wage distribution and for those in STEM occupations. These results are consistent with the view that AI has contributed to the automation of jobs and to widen inequality.
Bonfiglioli, A., Crinò, R., Gancia, G., Papadakis, I. (2025). Artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from US commuting zones. ECONOMIC POLICY, 40(121 (January 2025)), 145-194 [10.1093/epolic/eiae059].
Artificial intelligence and jobs: evidence from US commuting zones
Gancia, Gino
;
2025
Abstract
We study the effect of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on employment across US commuting zones (CZs) over the period 2000-2020. A simple model shows that AI can automate jobs or complement workers, and illustrates how to estimate its effect by exploiting variation in a novel measure of local exposure to AI: job growth in AI-related professions built from detailed occupational data. Using a shift-share instrument that combines industry-level AI adoption with local industry employment, we estimate robust negative effects of AI exposure on employment across CZs and time. We find that AI's impact is different from other capital and technologies, and that it works through services more than manufacturing. Moreover, the employment effect is especially negative for low-skill and production workers, while it turns positive for workers at the top of the wage distribution and for those in STEM occupations. These results are consistent with the view that AI has contributed to the automation of jobs and to widen inequality.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bonfiglioli-2025-Economic Policy-VoR.pdf
Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia di allegato:
Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione
649.56 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
649.56 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Bonfiglioli-2025-Economic Policy-AAM.pdf
embargo fino al 25/11/2025
Descrizione: LICENZA - https://academic.oup.com/pages/self_archiving_policy_b
Tipologia di allegato:
Author’s Accepted Manuscript, AAM (Post-print)
Licenza:
Licenza open access specifica dell’editore
Dimensione
2.69 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.69 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.