BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:: It is well established by a large number of randomized controlled trials that lowering blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by drugs are powerful means to reduce stroke incidence, but the optimal BP and LDL-C levels to be achieved are largely uncertain. Concerning BP targets, two hypotheses are being confronted: first, the lower the BP, the better the treatment outcome, and second, the hypothesis that too low BP values are accompanied by a lower benefit and even higher risk. It is also unknown whether BP lowering and LDL-C lowering have additive beneficial effects for the primary and secondary prevention of stroke, and whether these treatments can prevent cognitive decline after stroke. RESULTS:: A review of existing data from randomized controlled trials confirms that solid evidence on optimal BP and LDL-C targets is missing, possible interactions between BP and LDL-C lowering treatments have never been directly investigated, and evidence in favour of a beneficial effect of BP or LDL-C lowering on cognitive decline is, at best, very weak. CONCLUSION:: A new, large randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the optimal level of BP and LDL-C for the prevention of recurrent stroke and cognitive decline.

Zanchetti, A., Liu, L., Mancia, G., Parati, G., Grassi, G., Stramba Badiale, M., et al. (2014). Blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol lowering for prevention of strokes and cognitive decline: a review of available trial evidence. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 32(9), 1741-1750 [10.1097/HJH.0000000000000253].

Blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol lowering for prevention of strokes and cognitive decline: a review of available trial evidence

MANCIA, GIUSEPPE;PARATI, GIANFRANCO;GRASSI, GUIDO;BILO, GRZEGORZ;CORRAO, GIOVANNI;ZAMBON, ANTONELLA;SCOTTI, LORENZA;
2014

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:: It is well established by a large number of randomized controlled trials that lowering blood pressure (BP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by drugs are powerful means to reduce stroke incidence, but the optimal BP and LDL-C levels to be achieved are largely uncertain. Concerning BP targets, two hypotheses are being confronted: first, the lower the BP, the better the treatment outcome, and second, the hypothesis that too low BP values are accompanied by a lower benefit and even higher risk. It is also unknown whether BP lowering and LDL-C lowering have additive beneficial effects for the primary and secondary prevention of stroke, and whether these treatments can prevent cognitive decline after stroke. RESULTS:: A review of existing data from randomized controlled trials confirms that solid evidence on optimal BP and LDL-C targets is missing, possible interactions between BP and LDL-C lowering treatments have never been directly investigated, and evidence in favour of a beneficial effect of BP or LDL-C lowering on cognitive decline is, at best, very weak. CONCLUSION:: A new, large randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the optimal level of BP and LDL-C for the prevention of recurrent stroke and cognitive decline.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
blood pressure, cognitive decline, low-density, lipoprotein cholesterol, primary prevention, secondary prevention, stroke
English
2014
32
9
1741
1750
reserved
Zanchetti, A., Liu, L., Mancia, G., Parati, G., Grassi, G., Stramba Badiale, M., et al. (2014). Blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol lowering for prevention of strokes and cognitive decline: a review of available trial evidence. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 32(9), 1741-1750 [10.1097/HJH.0000000000000253].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Blood pressure and low density-J Hypertens 2014.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 349.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
349.02 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/52941
Citazioni
  • Scopus 38
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
Social impact