The live streaming platform Twitch underwent in recent years an impressive growth in terms of viewership and content diversity. The platform has been the object of several studies showcasing how streamers monetize their content via a peculiar system centered around para-sociality and community dynamics. Nonetheless, due to scarcity of data, lots is still unknown about the platform-wide relevance of this explanation as well as its effect on inequalities across streamers. In this paper, thanks to the recent availability of data showcasing the top 10,000 streamers revenue between 2019 and 2021, as well as viewership data from different sources, we characterized the popularity and audience monetization dynamics of the platform. Using methods from social physics and econometrics, we analyzed audience building and retention dynamics and linked them to observed inequalities. We found a high level of inequality across the platform, as well as an ability of top streamers to diversify their revenue sources, through audience renewal and diversification in monetization systems. Our results demonstrate that, even if the platform design and affordance favor monetization for smaller creators catering to specific niches, its non-algorithmic design still leaves room for classical choice biases allowing a few streamers to emerge, retain and renew a massive audience.

Houssard, A., Pilati, F., Tartari, M., Sacco, P., Gallotti, R. (2023). Monetization in online streaming platforms: an exploration of inequalities in Twitch.tv. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 13(1) [10.1038/s41598-022-26727-5].

Monetization in online streaming platforms: an exploration of inequalities in Twitch.tv

Pilati F.
Co-primo
;
2023

Abstract

The live streaming platform Twitch underwent in recent years an impressive growth in terms of viewership and content diversity. The platform has been the object of several studies showcasing how streamers monetize their content via a peculiar system centered around para-sociality and community dynamics. Nonetheless, due to scarcity of data, lots is still unknown about the platform-wide relevance of this explanation as well as its effect on inequalities across streamers. In this paper, thanks to the recent availability of data showcasing the top 10,000 streamers revenue between 2019 and 2021, as well as viewership data from different sources, we characterized the popularity and audience monetization dynamics of the platform. Using methods from social physics and econometrics, we analyzed audience building and retention dynamics and linked them to observed inequalities. We found a high level of inequality across the platform, as well as an ability of top streamers to diversify their revenue sources, through audience renewal and diversification in monetization systems. Our results demonstrate that, even if the platform design and affordance favor monetization for smaller creators catering to specific niches, its non-algorithmic design still leaves room for classical choice biases allowing a few streamers to emerge, retain and renew a massive audience.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Creator Economy; Monetization Systems; Platform Studies
English
20-gen-2023
2023
13
1
1103
open
Houssard, A., Pilati, F., Tartari, M., Sacco, P., Gallotti, R. (2023). Monetization in online streaming platforms: an exploration of inequalities in Twitch.tv. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 13(1) [10.1038/s41598-022-26727-5].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Houssard-2023-Scientific Reports-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 3.38 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.38 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/529323
Citazioni
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
Social impact