During the second half of the 20th century, several different theoretical approaches inside both philosophy and human sciences undermined humanistic and anthropocentric western tradition. These approaches offered a renewed perspective on human beings and their relationships with the non-human world. In doing this, they gained also from the international debate among several other disciplines, such as ecology, robotics, cybernetics, systems theory, complexity epistemology, structuralism, poststructuralism, ecocentrism, biocentrism, zoocentrism, ecofeminism, and – more recently – actor-network theory and post-human, just to mention a few. As a result, they took the distance from human-centered perspectives, which look at human beings as the only center of their concerns. According to anthropocentrism, human beings are unique, specials, privileged, separated, opposed to non-human entities and superior than them. This way of representing humans is no longer considered as adequate to contemporary globalized, multiethnic, hi-tech societies in which several technological, scientific, cultural, and existential changes deeply and quickly modified our way of living and thinking. Particularly, post-human is one of the most debated and controversial, and at the same time original and promising, interdisciplinary perspectives at present day. It considers the technological background behind contemporary changes, and moreover take a second critical look to the relationship between humans and the non-human world. Post-human tends indeed to go beyond ontological, epistemological, and ethical anthropocentrism that still influences the way in which we interpret the relationship between humans and – biological and mechanic – otherness. It also helps in switching the focus of several disciplines from humans to the relationships between humans and the non-human world. For this latter reason especially, it is one of the most important approaches to the rethinking of pedagogy outside of the humanistic framework. It can also help in providing solutions to the crises that affect the discipline nowadays. Moving into this debate and acknowledging the historical and cultural background of the age of technology, in my research I analyze and deconstruct philosophical assumptions and pedagogical implications of anthropocentrism. I then explore ethical and epistemological values that post-human can have for education. Drawing on both Riccardo Massa’s thought and post-human pedagogical studies, I also present a theoretical approach to redefine the main object of pedagogy in a world in which the rise of techno-science is parallel to the decline of humanistic tradition. Thus, education can be described as a particular network (or “dispositif”) produced by the dynamic interaction of both human and non-human elements, which should endorse a non-anthropocentric ethic.

(2014). L'educazione nell'età della tecnica. La prospettiva post-umanista e le implicazioni pedagogiche della crisi dell'antropocentrismo. (Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2014).

L'educazione nell'età della tecnica. La prospettiva post-umanista e le implicazioni pedagogiche della crisi dell'antropocentrismo

FERRANTE, ALESSANDRO PETER
2014

Abstract

During the second half of the 20th century, several different theoretical approaches inside both philosophy and human sciences undermined humanistic and anthropocentric western tradition. These approaches offered a renewed perspective on human beings and their relationships with the non-human world. In doing this, they gained also from the international debate among several other disciplines, such as ecology, robotics, cybernetics, systems theory, complexity epistemology, structuralism, poststructuralism, ecocentrism, biocentrism, zoocentrism, ecofeminism, and – more recently – actor-network theory and post-human, just to mention a few. As a result, they took the distance from human-centered perspectives, which look at human beings as the only center of their concerns. According to anthropocentrism, human beings are unique, specials, privileged, separated, opposed to non-human entities and superior than them. This way of representing humans is no longer considered as adequate to contemporary globalized, multiethnic, hi-tech societies in which several technological, scientific, cultural, and existential changes deeply and quickly modified our way of living and thinking. Particularly, post-human is one of the most debated and controversial, and at the same time original and promising, interdisciplinary perspectives at present day. It considers the technological background behind contemporary changes, and moreover take a second critical look to the relationship between humans and the non-human world. Post-human tends indeed to go beyond ontological, epistemological, and ethical anthropocentrism that still influences the way in which we interpret the relationship between humans and – biological and mechanic – otherness. It also helps in switching the focus of several disciplines from humans to the relationships between humans and the non-human world. For this latter reason especially, it is one of the most important approaches to the rethinking of pedagogy outside of the humanistic framework. It can also help in providing solutions to the crises that affect the discipline nowadays. Moving into this debate and acknowledging the historical and cultural background of the age of technology, in my research I analyze and deconstruct philosophical assumptions and pedagogical implications of anthropocentrism. I then explore ethical and epistemological values that post-human can have for education. Drawing on both Riccardo Massa’s thought and post-human pedagogical studies, I also present a theoretical approach to redefine the main object of pedagogy in a world in which the rise of techno-science is parallel to the decline of humanistic tradition. Thus, education can be described as a particular network (or “dispositif”) produced by the dynamic interaction of both human and non-human elements, which should endorse a non-anthropocentric ethic.
Campo DC Valore Lingua
dc.authority.academicField2024 Settore PAED-01/A - Pedagogia generale e sociale *
dc.authority.advisor PALMIERI, CRISTINA it
dc.authority.people FERRANTE, ALESSANDRO PETER it
dc.authority.phdCourse SCIENZE DELLA FORMAZIONE E DELLA COMUNICAZIONE - 47R it
dc.authority.phdSchool Scuola di Dottorato in Scienze Umane it
dc.collection.id.s e39773c1-7ce8-35a3-e053-3a05fe0aac26 *
dc.collection.name 07 - Tesi di dottorato Bicocca post 2009 *
dc.contributor.appartenenza DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE UMANE PER LA FORMAZIONE "RICCARDO MASSA" *
dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi 4412 *
dc.contributor.area AREA MIN. 11 - SCIENZE STORICHE, FILOSOFICHE, PEDAGOGICHE, PSICOLOGICHE *
dc.coverage.academiccycle 26 it
dc.coverage.academicyear 2012/2013 it
dc.date.accessioned 2014/09/22 16:30:56 -
dc.date.available 2014/09/22 16:30:56 -
dc.date.issued 2014-09-10 -
dc.description.abstracteng During the second half of the 20th century, several different theoretical approaches inside both philosophy and human sciences undermined humanistic and anthropocentric western tradition. These approaches offered a renewed perspective on human beings and their relationships with the non-human world. In doing this, they gained also from the international debate among several other disciplines, such as ecology, robotics, cybernetics, systems theory, complexity epistemology, structuralism, poststructuralism, ecocentrism, biocentrism, zoocentrism, ecofeminism, and – more recently – actor-network theory and post-human, just to mention a few. As a result, they took the distance from human-centered perspectives, which look at human beings as the only center of their concerns. According to anthropocentrism, human beings are unique, specials, privileged, separated, opposed to non-human entities and superior than them. This way of representing humans is no longer considered as adequate to contemporary globalized, multiethnic, hi-tech societies in which several technological, scientific, cultural, and existential changes deeply and quickly modified our way of living and thinking. Particularly, post-human is one of the most debated and controversial, and at the same time original and promising, interdisciplinary perspectives at present day. It considers the technological background behind contemporary changes, and moreover take a second critical look to the relationship between humans and the non-human world. Post-human tends indeed to go beyond ontological, epistemological, and ethical anthropocentrism that still influences the way in which we interpret the relationship between humans and – biological and mechanic – otherness. It also helps in switching the focus of several disciplines from humans to the relationships between humans and the non-human world. For this latter reason especially, it is one of the most important approaches to the rethinking of pedagogy outside of the humanistic framework. It can also help in providing solutions to the crises that affect the discipline nowadays. Moving into this debate and acknowledging the historical and cultural background of the age of technology, in my research I analyze and deconstruct philosophical assumptions and pedagogical implications of anthropocentrism. I then explore ethical and epistemological values that post-human can have for education. Drawing on both Riccardo Massa’s thought and post-human pedagogical studies, I also present a theoretical approach to redefine the main object of pedagogy in a world in which the rise of techno-science is parallel to the decline of humanistic tradition. Thus, education can be described as a particular network (or “dispositif”) produced by the dynamic interaction of both human and non-human elements, which should endorse a non-anthropocentric ethic. -
dc.description.allpeople Ferrante, A -
dc.description.allpeopleoriginal Ferrante, -
dc.description.codicestruttura 4412 it
dc.description.doctoreuropaeus No it
dc.description.fulltext open en
dc.description.fulltextoriginal open en
dc.description.numberofauthors 1 -
dc.identifier.citation (2014). L'educazione nell'età della tecnica. La prospettiva post-umanista e le implicazioni pedagogiche della crisi dell'antropocentrismo. (Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2014). it
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10281/52917 -
dc.language.iso ita it
dc.publisher.country Italy -
dc.publisher.name Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca -
dc.subject.keywordseng Pedagogy, Education, Post-human, Post-humanism, Anthropocentrism, Riccardo Massa -
dc.subject.singlekeyword Pedagogy *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Education *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Post-human *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Post-humanism *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Anthropocentrism *
dc.subject.singlekeyword Riccardo Massa *
dc.title L'educazione nell'età della tecnica. La prospettiva post-umanista e le implicazioni pedagogiche della crisi dell'antropocentrismo it
dc.type Tesi di dottorato -
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis -
dc.type.full Pubblicazioni::07 - Tesi di dottorato Bicocca post 2009 it
dc.type.miur -2.0 -
iris.bncf.datainvio 2025/10/29 16:13:41 *
iris.bncf.handle 20.500.14242/172732 *
iris.bncf.nbn URN:NBN:IT:UNIMIB-172732 *
iris.bncf.stato 2 *
iris.bncf.uuid 425aa0c7-0a10-44d1-a4d5-c9ac29e8f4a0 *
iris.mediafilter.data 2025/04/04 03:57:14 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate 2023/12/21 12:13:20 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond 1703157200310 *
iris.sitodocente.maxattempts 2 -
Appare nelle tipologie: 07 - Tesi di dottorato Bicocca post 2009
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Phd_unimib_056485.pdf

Accesso Aperto

Tipologia di allegato: Doctoral thesis
Dimensione 2.49 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.49 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/52917
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact