Objective The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a widely used test for cognitive screening as its execution taps into a large number of cognitive functions. Because of the involvement of visuospatial abilities, the CDT is also commonly used to assess hemispatial neglect. In the present study, we introduce a new quantitative scoring method for the CDT that aims to measure the use of space for each half of the clock face and asymmetries of space use.Method Two measures are introduced: the explored space (ES) and used space (US) for each half of the clock, as well as two derived asymmetry indices. Such new measures were applied to CDTs of four groups of participants: right brain-damaged patients without visuospatial neglect, two groups of right brain-damaged patients with varying degrees of visuospatial neglect, and a group of neurologically healthy participants.Results Analyses showed that only neglect patients explored and used the left clock half significantly less than the right one. This result was also confirmed by the asymmetry indices, where neglect patients showed a stronger rightward bias. For neglect patients, the US asymmetry index correlated with the patients' scores on the neuropsychological tests. The analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that left US and left ES scores had good accuracy in categorizing neglect patients.Conclusions The present work provides new quantitative indices of CDT space usage in hemispatial neglect. Cutoffs are provided for clinical practice.

Diana, L., Rusconi, M., Aiello, E., Bolognini, N., Monti, A., Corbo, M., et al. (2024). Quantifying the Use of Space in the Clock Drawing Test: Validity in Hemispatial Neglect. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY [10.1093/arclin/acae059].

Quantifying the Use of Space in the Clock Drawing Test: Validity in Hemispatial Neglect

Diana, Lorenzo;Aiello, Edoardo Nicolò;Bolognini, Nadia;
2024

Abstract

Objective The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a widely used test for cognitive screening as its execution taps into a large number of cognitive functions. Because of the involvement of visuospatial abilities, the CDT is also commonly used to assess hemispatial neglect. In the present study, we introduce a new quantitative scoring method for the CDT that aims to measure the use of space for each half of the clock face and asymmetries of space use.Method Two measures are introduced: the explored space (ES) and used space (US) for each half of the clock, as well as two derived asymmetry indices. Such new measures were applied to CDTs of four groups of participants: right brain-damaged patients without visuospatial neglect, two groups of right brain-damaged patients with varying degrees of visuospatial neglect, and a group of neurologically healthy participants.Results Analyses showed that only neglect patients explored and used the left clock half significantly less than the right one. This result was also confirmed by the asymmetry indices, where neglect patients showed a stronger rightward bias. For neglect patients, the US asymmetry index correlated with the patients' scores on the neuropsychological tests. The analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that left US and left ES scores had good accuracy in categorizing neglect patients.Conclusions The present work provides new quantitative indices of CDT space usage in hemispatial neglect. Cutoffs are provided for clinical practice.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Clock Drawing Test; Hemispatial neglect; Neuropsychological assessment
English
24-lug-2024
2024
none
Diana, L., Rusconi, M., Aiello, E., Bolognini, N., Monti, A., Corbo, M., et al. (2024). Quantifying the Use of Space in the Clock Drawing Test: Validity in Hemispatial Neglect. ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY [10.1093/arclin/acae059].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/525487
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact