Irony detection is a complex task that often stumps both humans, who frequently misinterpret ironic statements, and artificial intelligence (AI) systems. While the majority of AI research on irony detection has concentrated on linguistic cues, the role of non-verbal cues like facial expressions and auditory signals has been largely overlooked. This paper investigates the effectiveness of machine learning models in recognizing irony using solely non-verbal cues. To this end, we conducted the following experiments and analysis: (i) we trained and evaluated some machine-learning models to detect irony; (ii) we compared the results with human interpretations; and (iii) we analysed and identified multi-modal non-verbal irony markers. Our research demonstrates that machine learning models trained on nonverbal data have shown significant promise in detecting irony, outperforming human judgments in this task. Specifically, we found that certain facial action units and acoustic characteristics of speech are key indicators of irony expression. These non-verbal cues, often overlooked in traditional irony detection methods, were effectively identified by machine learning models, leading to improved accuracy in detecting irony.

Spitale, M., Catania, F., Panzeri, F. (2024). Understanding Non-Verbal Irony Markers: Machine Learning Insights Versus Human Judgment. In ICMI '24: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 164-172). Association for Computing Machinery New York NY United States [10.1145/3678957.3685723].

Understanding Non-Verbal Irony Markers: Machine Learning Insights Versus Human Judgment

Panzeri, F
2024

Abstract

Irony detection is a complex task that often stumps both humans, who frequently misinterpret ironic statements, and artificial intelligence (AI) systems. While the majority of AI research on irony detection has concentrated on linguistic cues, the role of non-verbal cues like facial expressions and auditory signals has been largely overlooked. This paper investigates the effectiveness of machine learning models in recognizing irony using solely non-verbal cues. To this end, we conducted the following experiments and analysis: (i) we trained and evaluated some machine-learning models to detect irony; (ii) we compared the results with human interpretations; and (iii) we analysed and identified multi-modal non-verbal irony markers. Our research demonstrates that machine learning models trained on nonverbal data have shown significant promise in detecting irony, outperforming human judgments in this task. Specifically, we found that certain facial action units and acoustic characteristics of speech are key indicators of irony expression. These non-verbal cues, often overlooked in traditional irony detection methods, were effectively identified by machine learning models, leading to improved accuracy in detecting irony.
Capitolo o saggio
Affective computing; Dataset; Irony detection; Multi-modal
English
ICMI '24: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
2024
9798400704628
Association for Computing Machinery New York NY United States
164
172
Spitale, M., Catania, F., Panzeri, F. (2024). Understanding Non-Verbal Irony Markers: Machine Learning Insights Versus Human Judgment. In ICMI '24: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 164-172). Association for Computing Machinery New York NY United States [10.1145/3678957.3685723].
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/522867
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact