The efficacy of noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to improve outcomes in severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) due to pneumonia has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to compare CPAP vs. oxygen therapy to reduce the risk of meeting criteria for endotracheal intubation (ETI).

Brambilla, A., Aliberti, S., Prina, E., Nicoli, F., Forno, M., Nava, S., et al. (2014). Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 40(7), 942-949 [10.1007/s00134-014-3325-5].

Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia

ALIBERTI, STEFANO;
2014

Abstract

The efficacy of noninvasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to improve outcomes in severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) due to pneumonia has not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to compare CPAP vs. oxygen therapy to reduce the risk of meeting criteria for endotracheal intubation (ETI).
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
pneumonia; ventilation; CPAP; oxygen; acute respiratory failure
English
2014
40
7
942
949
none
Brambilla, A., Aliberti, S., Prina, E., Nicoli, F., Forno, M., Nava, S., et al. (2014). Helmet CPAP vs. oxygen therapy in severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to pneumonia. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 40(7), 942-949 [10.1007/s00134-014-3325-5].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/52168
Citazioni
  • Scopus 134
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 115
Social impact