Homoparentality represents both a critical matter and a challenge in the Italian context. From a legal viewpoint, most difficulties are created by a constitutional disposition, article 29, which identifies family as a «natural society based on marriage». But what «natural society» means? Can we have families without marriage? This paper frames these issues, in attempt to dismantle the false obstacles against the recognition and juridical protection of homoparental families. At the same time the author tries to point out limits and dangers of a prejudice-based approach on family.

Saporiti, M. (2014). Omogenitorialità, famiglia e «mero pregiudizio». RAGION PRATICA, 42, 247-272 [10.1415/76463].

Omogenitorialità, famiglia e «mero pregiudizio»

SAPORITI, MICHELE
2014

Abstract

Homoparentality represents both a critical matter and a challenge in the Italian context. From a legal viewpoint, most difficulties are created by a constitutional disposition, article 29, which identifies family as a «natural society based on marriage». But what «natural society» means? Can we have families without marriage? This paper frames these issues, in attempt to dismantle the false obstacles against the recognition and juridical protection of homoparental families. At the same time the author tries to point out limits and dangers of a prejudice-based approach on family.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Family; Homoparentality, Nature, Prejudice
Italian
giu-2014
42
247
272
none
Saporiti, M. (2014). Omogenitorialità, famiglia e «mero pregiudizio». RAGION PRATICA, 42, 247-272 [10.1415/76463].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/51833
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact