Conversation analysis (CA) to identify metaphoric language (ML) has been proposed as a tool for the differential diagnosis of epileptic (ES) and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). However, the clinical relevance of metaphoric conceptualizations is not clearly defined. The current study aims to investigate the ML utilized by individuals with ES and PNES in a pulled multi-country sample. Two blinded researchers examined the transcripts and videos of 54 interviews of individuals (n = 29, Italy; n = 11, USA; n = 14, Russia) with ES and PNES, identifying the patient-seizure relationship representative of the patient's internal experience. The diagnoses were based on video-EEG. Metaphors were classified as "Space/place", "External force", "Voluntary action", and "Other". A total of 175 metaphors were identified. No differences between individuals with ES and PNES were found in metaphoric occurrence (chi 2 (1, N = 54) = 0.07; p = 0.74). No differences were identified when comparing the types of metaphors utilized by participants with ES and those with PNES. Patients with PNES and ES did not demonstrate differences in terms of occurrence and categories in ML. Therefore, researchers and clinicians should carefully consider the use of metaphor conceptualizations for diagnostic purposes.

Urh, L., Piscitelli, D., Beghi, M., Diotti, S., Erba, G., Magaudda, A., et al. (2024). Metaphoric language in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Time to move forward. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 25 [10.1016/j.ebr.2023.100639].

Metaphoric language in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Time to move forward

Urh, L;Piscitelli, D
Secondo
;
Beghi, M;Diotti, S;Cornaggia, CM
2024

Abstract

Conversation analysis (CA) to identify metaphoric language (ML) has been proposed as a tool for the differential diagnosis of epileptic (ES) and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). However, the clinical relevance of metaphoric conceptualizations is not clearly defined. The current study aims to investigate the ML utilized by individuals with ES and PNES in a pulled multi-country sample. Two blinded researchers examined the transcripts and videos of 54 interviews of individuals (n = 29, Italy; n = 11, USA; n = 14, Russia) with ES and PNES, identifying the patient-seizure relationship representative of the patient's internal experience. The diagnoses were based on video-EEG. Metaphors were classified as "Space/place", "External force", "Voluntary action", and "Other". A total of 175 metaphors were identified. No differences between individuals with ES and PNES were found in metaphoric occurrence (chi 2 (1, N = 54) = 0.07; p = 0.74). No differences were identified when comparing the types of metaphors utilized by participants with ES and those with PNES. Patients with PNES and ES did not demonstrate differences in terms of occurrence and categories in ML. Therefore, researchers and clinicians should carefully consider the use of metaphor conceptualizations for diagnostic purposes.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Conversation analysis; Epileptic seizures; Metaphors; Nonepileptic seizures; Psychogenic seizures;
English
21-dic-2023
2024
25
100639
open
Urh, L., Piscitelli, D., Beghi, M., Diotti, S., Erba, G., Magaudda, A., et al. (2024). Metaphoric language in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: Time to move forward. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR REPORTS, 25 [10.1016/j.ebr.2023.100639].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Urh-2024-Esy Behav Rep-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 370.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
370.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/516502
Citazioni
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
Social impact