Being bilingual confers certain behavioral effects. Determining their precise origin is of utmost importance given the need to avoid unjust misattribution of labels such as “bilingual (dis) advantage” to people’s bilingual experiences. To this end, this systematic PRISMA-based review aims to shed light on the social and sociolinguistic origins of bilingualism-related behavioral effects. Analyzing 368 studies, we find that 73.41% of the 267 studies that report such effects attribute them either to sociolinguistic factors alone or to the interaction of sociolinguistic and cognitive factors. Linking the two fronts, type of effect and origin of effect, we find a previously unreported correlation: Studies that find evidence for bilingual disadvantages are more likely to claim a sociolinguistic origin, while studies that report advantages are more likely to link their findings to a cognitive origin. We discuss these results and present the key components of a sociolinguistic theory of the origin of bilingual effects.

Masullo, C., Dentella, V., Leivada, E. (2024). 73% of the observed bilingual (dis)advantageous effects on cognition stem from sociolinguistic factors: A systematic review. BILINGUALISM, 27(3 (May 2024)), 480-494 [10.1017/s1366728923000664].

73% of the observed bilingual (dis)advantageous effects on cognition stem from sociolinguistic factors: A systematic review

Masullo, Camilla;
2024

Abstract

Being bilingual confers certain behavioral effects. Determining their precise origin is of utmost importance given the need to avoid unjust misattribution of labels such as “bilingual (dis) advantage” to people’s bilingual experiences. To this end, this systematic PRISMA-based review aims to shed light on the social and sociolinguistic origins of bilingualism-related behavioral effects. Analyzing 368 studies, we find that 73.41% of the 267 studies that report such effects attribute them either to sociolinguistic factors alone or to the interaction of sociolinguistic and cognitive factors. Linking the two fronts, type of effect and origin of effect, we find a previously unreported correlation: Studies that find evidence for bilingual disadvantages are more likely to claim a sociolinguistic origin, while studies that report advantages are more likely to link their findings to a cognitive origin. We discuss these results and present the key components of a sociolinguistic theory of the origin of bilingual effects.
Articolo in rivista - Review Essay
bilingualism; cognitive adaptations; socio-economic status; sociolinguistic prestige;
English
22-set-2023
2024
27
3 (May 2024)
480
494
open
Masullo, C., Dentella, V., Leivada, E. (2024). 73% of the observed bilingual (dis)advantageous effects on cognition stem from sociolinguistic factors: A systematic review. BILINGUALISM, 27(3 (May 2024)), 480-494 [10.1017/s1366728923000664].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Masullo-2024-Bilingualism-VoR.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Creative Commons
Dimensione 604.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
604.33 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/513803
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
Social impact