The article moves from a comparison between the prologue of Plato’s Protagoras and Nietzsche's Untimely Meditation II (Vom Nutzen und Nachtheil der Historie für das Leben, 1874) in order to identify, among the fundamental questions of philosophy, the task of understanding the relationship, inevitably circular, subsisting between personal existence and knowledge. In the last part, looking at the problem of teaching philosophy today, it proposes a reformulation of that task in the contest of a systemic interpretations of contemporary society.

Nobile, M. (2008). Perché, ancora, filosofia?. RASSEGNA, 37(dicembre), 40-49.

Perché, ancora, filosofia?

NOBILE, MAURO
2008-12

Abstract

The article moves from a comparison between the prologue of Plato’s Protagoras and Nietzsche's Untimely Meditation II (Vom Nutzen und Nachtheil der Historie für das Leben, 1874) in order to identify, among the fundamental questions of philosophy, the task of understanding the relationship, inevitably circular, subsisting between personal existence and knowledge. In the last part, looking at the problem of teaching philosophy today, it proposes a reformulation of that task in the contest of a systemic interpretations of contemporary society.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Filosofia; Sapere; Esistenza; Platone; Nietzsche; Luhmann, teaching Philosophy; Plato on existence and knowledge; Nietzsche on Existence and Knowledge
Italian
40
49
Nobile, M. (2008). Perché, ancora, filosofia?. RASSEGNA, 37(dicembre), 40-49.
Nobile, M
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10281/5065
Citazioni
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact