We assume that multivariate observational data are generated from a distribution whose conditional independencies are encoded in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). For any given DAG, the causal effect of a variable onto another one can be evaluated through intervention calculus. A DAG is typically not identifiable from observational data alone. However, its Markov equivalence class (a collection of DAGs) can be estimated from the data. As a consequence, for the same intervention a set of causal effects, one for each DAG in the equivalence class, can be evaluated. In this paper, we propose a fully Bayesian methodology to make inference on the causal effects of any intervention in the system. Main features of our method are: (a) both uncertainty on the equivalence class and the causal effects are jointly modeled; (b) priors on the parameters of the modified Cholesky decomposition of the precision matrices across all DAG models are constructively assigned starting from a unique prior on the complete (unrestricted) DAG; (c) an efficient algorithm to sample from the posterior distribution on graph space is adopted; (d) an objective Bayes approach, requiring virtually no user specification, is used throughout. We demonstrate the merits of our methodology in simulation studies, wherein comparisons with current state-of-the-art procedures turn out to be highly satisfactory. Finally we examine a real data set of gene expressions for Arabidopsis thaliana.

Castelletti, F., Consonni, G. (2021). Bayesian inference of causal effects from observational data in Gaussian graphical models. BIOMETRICS, 77(1), 136-149 [10.1111/biom.13281].

Bayesian inference of causal effects from observational data in Gaussian graphical models

Castelletti F.
;
2021

Abstract

We assume that multivariate observational data are generated from a distribution whose conditional independencies are encoded in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). For any given DAG, the causal effect of a variable onto another one can be evaluated through intervention calculus. A DAG is typically not identifiable from observational data alone. However, its Markov equivalence class (a collection of DAGs) can be estimated from the data. As a consequence, for the same intervention a set of causal effects, one for each DAG in the equivalence class, can be evaluated. In this paper, we propose a fully Bayesian methodology to make inference on the causal effects of any intervention in the system. Main features of our method are: (a) both uncertainty on the equivalence class and the causal effects are jointly modeled; (b) priors on the parameters of the modified Cholesky decomposition of the precision matrices across all DAG models are constructively assigned starting from a unique prior on the complete (unrestricted) DAG; (c) an efficient algorithm to sample from the posterior distribution on graph space is adopted; (d) an objective Bayes approach, requiring virtually no user specification, is used throughout. We demonstrate the merits of our methodology in simulation studies, wherein comparisons with current state-of-the-art procedures turn out to be highly satisfactory. Finally we examine a real data set of gene expressions for Arabidopsis thaliana.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
causal inference; directed acyclic graph; graphical model; Markov equivalence class; objective Bayes; observational data;
English
2021
77
1
136
149
reserved
Castelletti, F., Consonni, G. (2021). Bayesian inference of causal effects from observational data in Gaussian graphical models. BIOMETRICS, 77(1), 136-149 [10.1111/biom.13281].
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Castelletti-2021-Biometrics-VoR.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia di allegato: Publisher’s Version (Version of Record, VoR)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati
Dimensione 506.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
506.25 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/503562
Citazioni
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 10
Social impact