This paper examines how the nature of the technological regime governing innovative activities and the structure of demand interact in determining market structure, with specific reference to the pharmaceutical industry.The main results are that, while technological regimes remain fundamental determinants of the patterns of innovation, the demand structure plays a crucial role in preventing the emergence of concentration through a partially endogenous process of discovery of new submarkets. However, it is not simply market fragmentation as such that produces this result, but rather the entity of the “prize” that innovators can gain relative to the overall size of the market. Further, the model shows that emerging industry leaders are innovative early entrants in large submarkets. The key question concerns the observation that—despite high degrees ofR&D and marketing-intensity—concentration has been consistently low during the whole evolution of the industry. Standard explanations of this phenomenon refer to the random nature of the innovative process, the patterns of imitation, and the fragmented nature of the market into multiple, independent submarkets. We delve deeper into this issue by using an improved version of our previous “history-friendly” model of the evolution of pharmaceuticals. Thus, we explore the way in which changes in the technological regime and/or in the structure of demand may generate or not substantially higher degrees of concentration.

Garavaglia, C., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., Pezzoni, M. (2012). Technological Regimes and Demand Structure in the Evolution of the Pharmaceutical Industry. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 22(4), 677-709 [10.1007/s00191-012-0285-1].

Technological Regimes and Demand Structure in the Evolution of the Pharmaceutical Industry

GARAVAGLIA, CHRISTIAN;
2012

Abstract

This paper examines how the nature of the technological regime governing innovative activities and the structure of demand interact in determining market structure, with specific reference to the pharmaceutical industry.The main results are that, while technological regimes remain fundamental determinants of the patterns of innovation, the demand structure plays a crucial role in preventing the emergence of concentration through a partially endogenous process of discovery of new submarkets. However, it is not simply market fragmentation as such that produces this result, but rather the entity of the “prize” that innovators can gain relative to the overall size of the market. Further, the model shows that emerging industry leaders are innovative early entrants in large submarkets. The key question concerns the observation that—despite high degrees ofR&D and marketing-intensity—concentration has been consistently low during the whole evolution of the industry. Standard explanations of this phenomenon refer to the random nature of the innovative process, the patterns of imitation, and the fragmented nature of the market into multiple, independent submarkets. We delve deeper into this issue by using an improved version of our previous “history-friendly” model of the evolution of pharmaceuticals. Thus, we explore the way in which changes in the technological regime and/or in the structure of demand may generate or not substantially higher degrees of concentration.
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Industrial dynamics, Innovation, Market structure, Pharmaceuticals, History-friendly model
English
2012
22
4
677
709
none
Garavaglia, C., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L., Pezzoni, M. (2012). Technological Regimes and Demand Structure in the Evolution of the Pharmaceutical Industry. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 22(4), 677-709 [10.1007/s00191-012-0285-1].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/48993
Citazioni
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
Social impact