BACKGROUND: Limited data are available in our region on out-of-hospital treatment of cardiac arrest. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the changes implemented in the emergency system (i.e. an increased number of basic life support and advance life support crews that were dispatched) produced the expected outcome improvements. METHODS: (a) Experimental design: data were prospectively collected on patients with sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in three emergency dispatch centers for 3 months during two study periods, year 2000 and year 2003, differentiated only by the increase of qualified crews. Outcomes and survival were evaluated at 24 h and 1 month after the event. (b) Setting: out-of-hospital treatment. (c) Patients: 352 (174 in the second study period) patients suffering cardiac arrest. (d) Interventions: the study was observational. RESULTS: We could document, between the two study periods, stable 24 h (12.6 vs 9.1%) and 1 month survival (3.4 vs 5.8%, NS). Nevertheless, arrival time on site was significantly higher in the second period (from 8.3±3.3 to 10.1±5.4 min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The strengthening of only one link of the chain-of-survival did not improve 1 month survival. © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

CITERIO, G., Buquicchio, I., Rossi, G., Landriscina, M., Raimondi, M., Petrovich, L., et al. (2006). Prospective performance evaluation of emergency medical services for cardiac arrest in Lombardia: is something moving forward?. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 13(4), 192-196 [10.1097/01.mej.0000209053.63010.c6].

Prospective performance evaluation of emergency medical services for cardiac arrest in Lombardia: is something moving forward?

CITERIO, GIUSEPPE;PESENTI, ANTONIO MARIA
2006

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available in our region on out-of-hospital treatment of cardiac arrest. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the changes implemented in the emergency system (i.e. an increased number of basic life support and advance life support crews that were dispatched) produced the expected outcome improvements. METHODS: (a) Experimental design: data were prospectively collected on patients with sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in three emergency dispatch centers for 3 months during two study periods, year 2000 and year 2003, differentiated only by the increase of qualified crews. Outcomes and survival were evaluated at 24 h and 1 month after the event. (b) Setting: out-of-hospital treatment. (c) Patients: 352 (174 in the second study period) patients suffering cardiac arrest. (d) Interventions: the study was observational. RESULTS: We could document, between the two study periods, stable 24 h (12.6 vs 9.1%) and 1 month survival (3.4 vs 5.8%, NS). Nevertheless, arrival time on site was significantly higher in the second period (from 8.3±3.3 to 10.1±5.4 min, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The strengthening of only one link of the chain-of-survival did not improve 1 month survival. © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
No
Articolo in rivista - Articolo scientifico
Scientifica
performance, evaluation, emergency, cardiac arrest, Lombardia
English
192
196
5
CITERIO, G., Buquicchio, I., Rossi, G., Landriscina, M., Raimondi, M., Petrovich, L., et al. (2006). Prospective performance evaluation of emergency medical services for cardiac arrest in Lombardia: is something moving forward?. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 13(4), 192-196 [10.1097/01.mej.0000209053.63010.c6].
Citerio, G; Buquicchio, I; Rossi, G; Landriscina, M; Raimondi, M; Petrovich, L; Pesenti, A
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
European Journal of Emergency Medicine 2006 Citerio.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Dimensione 118.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
118.05 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/10281/4819
Citazioni
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
Social impact