Focusing is a proof-theoretic device to structure proof search in the sequent calculus: it provides a normal form to cut-free proofs in which the application of invertible and non-invertible inference rules is structured in two separate and disjoint phases. It is commonly believed that every “reasonable” sequent calculus has a natural focused version. Although stemming from proof-search considerations, focusing has not been thoroughly investigated in actual theorem proving, in par- ticular w.r.t. termination, if not for the folk observations that only neg- ative formulas need to be duplicated (or contracted if seen from the top down) in the focusing phase. We present a contraction-free (and hence terminating) focused proof system for multi-succedent propositional intu- itionistic logic, which refines the G4ip calculus of Vorob’ev, Hudelmeier and Dyckhoff. We prove the completeness of the approach semantically and argue that this offers a viable alternative to other more syntactical means.

Avellone, A., Fiorentini, C., Momigliano, A. (2013). Focusing on Contraction. In Proceedings of the 28th Italian Conference on Computational Logic. Catania, Italy, September 25-27, 2013 (pp.65-81).

Focusing on Contraction

AVELLONE, ALESSANDRO;
2013

Abstract

Focusing is a proof-theoretic device to structure proof search in the sequent calculus: it provides a normal form to cut-free proofs in which the application of invertible and non-invertible inference rules is structured in two separate and disjoint phases. It is commonly believed that every “reasonable” sequent calculus has a natural focused version. Although stemming from proof-search considerations, focusing has not been thoroughly investigated in actual theorem proving, in par- ticular w.r.t. termination, if not for the folk observations that only neg- ative formulas need to be duplicated (or contracted if seen from the top down) in the focusing phase. We present a contraction-free (and hence terminating) focused proof system for multi-succedent propositional intu- itionistic logic, which refines the G4ip calculus of Vorob’ev, Hudelmeier and Dyckhoff. We prove the completeness of the approach semantically and argue that this offers a viable alternative to other more syntactical means.
paper
Intuitionistic logic, Automated theorem proving
English
Italian Conference on Computational Logic
2013
Cantone, D; Nicolosi Asmundo, M
Proceedings of the 28th Italian Conference on Computational Logic. Catania, Italy, September 25-27, 2013
2013
1068
65
81
open
Avellone, A., Fiorentini, C., Momigliano, A. (2013). Focusing on Contraction. In Proceedings of the 28th Italian Conference on Computational Logic. Catania, Italy, September 25-27, 2013 (pp.65-81).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
paper-l05.pdf

accesso aperto

Dimensione 552 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
552 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/10281/47662
Citazioni
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
Social impact